Seek Returns logo

BA vs. GD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at BA and GD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

BA’s market capitalization of 151.51 billion USD is substantially larger than GD’s 75.43 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

BA’s beta of 1.42 points to significantly higher volatility compared to GD (beta: 0.47), suggesting BA has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolBAGD
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyGeneral Dynamics Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
CEOMr. Robert K. OrtbergMs. Phebe N. Novakovic
Price200.94 USD281.05 USD
Market Cap151.51 billion USD75.43 billion USD
Beta1.420.47
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateJanuary 2, 1962January 13, 1978
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and GD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Profitability

Return on Equity

BA

94.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.78%
Q3
16.41%
Median
8.87%
Q1
0.61%
Min
-5.25%

BA’s Return on Equity of 94.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GD

17.81%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.78%
Q3
16.41%
Median
8.87%
Q1
0.61%
Min
-5.25%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s Return on Equity of 17.81% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their ROE against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

BA

-16.36%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.84%
Median
5.97%
Q1
-2.11%
Min
-17.13%

BA has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -16.36%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

GD

10.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.84%
Median
5.97%
Q1
-2.11%
Min
-17.13%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s Return on Invested Capital of 10.43% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their ROIC against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

BA

-16.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.63%
Q3
7.98%
Median
5.29%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-7.33%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -16.58%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GD

8.08%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.63%
Q3
7.98%
Median
5.29%
Q1
-0.45%
Min
-7.33%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.08% places GD in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

BA

-14.63%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.89%
Q3
10.92%
Median
7.91%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-4.96%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -14.63%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GD

10.22%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.89%
Q3
10.92%
Median
7.91%
Q1
3.94%
Min
-4.96%

GD’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.22% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Return on Equity (TTM)94.43%17.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.36%7.03%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-16.36%10.43%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-16.58%8.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-14.63%10.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-2.09%15.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.34
Median
2.08
Q1
1.23
Min
0.08

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GD

1.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.34
Median
2.08
Q1
1.23
Min
0.08

GD’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

BA

-16.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.77
Median
0.52
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

BA has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -16.13, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

GD

0.52

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.77
Median
0.52
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

GD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

BA

-3.55

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.65
Median
2.95
Q1
1.56
Min
-6.68

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GD

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.65
Median
2.95
Q1
1.56
Min
-6.68

Interest Coverage Ratio data for GD is currently unavailable.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Current Ratio (TTM)1.231.34
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.370.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-16.130.52
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.340.20
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-6.181.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.55--

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for BA and GD. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth (YoY)

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

EPS Growth (YoY)

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year EPS (Earnings Per Share) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth (YoY)

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.96%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GD

2.05%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.96%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.05%, GD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

BA

-0.63%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
76.64%
Q3
36.30%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a negative Dividend Payout Ratio of -0.63%. This typically means the company paid a dividend despite reporting a net loss, a situation that may signal financial instability.

GD

39.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
76.64%
Q3
36.30%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.00% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)-0.63%39.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

BA

-13.15

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
72.97
Q3
65.44
Median
36.84
Q1
23.26
Min
3.57

BA has a negative P/E Ratio of -13.15. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

GD

19.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
72.97
Q3
65.44
Median
36.84
Q1
23.26
Min
3.57

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s P/E Ratio of 19.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

BA

-6.02

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
5.68
Median
2.15
Q1
1.18
Min
0.01

BA has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -6.02. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

GD

2.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
5.68
Median
2.15
Q1
1.18
Min
0.01

GD’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.13 is within the middle range of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

BA

2.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.02
Median
2.46
Q1
1.56
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GD

1.53

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
11.66
Q3
7.02
Median
2.46
Q1
1.56
Min
0.33

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s P/S Ratio of 1.53 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

BA

-45.53

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
7.31
Median
4.08
Q1
2.49
Min
1.06

BA has a negative P/B Ratio of -45.53, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

GD

3.40

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.30
Q3
7.31
Median
4.08
Q1
2.49
Min
1.06

GD’s P/B Ratio of 3.40 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-13.1519.01
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)-6.022.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)2.181.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-45.533.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-11.8722.56
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-27.7314.57
EV-to-Sales (TTM)2.811.74