Seek Returns logo

BA vs. GD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and GD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAGD
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyGeneral Dynamics Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization163.56 billion USD92.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and GD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. GD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
5-Day Price Return-0.36%3.45%
13-Week Price Return0.18%16.58%
26-Week Price Return26.83%26.06%
52-Week Price Return41.47%13.06%
Month-to-Date Return0.22%0.77%
Year-to-Date Return22.20%30.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.42M1.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.83M1.12M
3-Month Volatility24.33%16.77%
Beta1.190.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GD

17.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

GD’s Return on Equity of 17.99% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

GD

8.13%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

GD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

GD

10.30%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

GD’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.30% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%17.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%7.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%8.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%10.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%15.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GD

1.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

GD’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GD

0.37

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

GD

15.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

GD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.231.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6015.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. GD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. GD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.10%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GD

1.70%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.70%, GD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GD

38.28%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

GD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.28% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.10%1.70%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%38.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

GD

22.52

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s P/E Ratio of 22.52 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.18

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.18 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GD

1.83

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

GD’s P/S Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GD

3.32

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

GD’s P/B Ratio of 3.32 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BA vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Aerospace & Defense industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAGD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--22.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.181.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.783.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.6820.85