Seek Returns logo

BA vs. EMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BA and EMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBAEMR
Company NameThe Boeing CompanyEmerson Electric Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization176.46 billion USD75.98 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BA and EMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BA vs. EMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBAEMR
5-Day Price Return2.66%1.63%
13-Week Price Return17.55%13.06%
26-Week Price Return26.28%5.90%
52-Week Price Return42.19%30.98%
Month-to-Date Return5.20%-7.22%
Year-to-Date Return31.85%8.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.02M4.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.67M3.30M
3-Month Volatility27.11%23.55%
Beta1.511.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BA

2,402.16%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

BA’s Return on Equity of 2,402.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-14.18%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

BA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -14.18%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BA

-12.27%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

BA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.27%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBAEMR
Return on Equity (TTM)2,402.16%13.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.06%6.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-14.18%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-12.27%17.42%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-0.32%52.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1.23

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

BA’s Current Ratio of 1.23 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BA

117.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 117.95, BA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BA

-3.60

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

BA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -3.60. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBAEMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.230.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.380.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)117.950.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-3.6018.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

BA vs. EMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BA vs. EMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BA

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR

1.59%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.59%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BA

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBAEMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.09%1.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%45.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BA

--

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for BA is currently unavailable.

EMR

28.34

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 28.34 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BA

2.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

BA’s P/S Ratio of 2.36 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EMR

4.23

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.23 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BA

1,764.78

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 1,764.78, BA’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BA vs. EMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBAEMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--28.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.364.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,764.783.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.1127.42