AZO vs. W: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AZO dominates in value with a market cap of 64.78 billion USD, eclipsing W’s 4.67 billion USD by roughly 13.86×.

W carries a higher beta at 2.94, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AZO and W over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and W based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• W shows a negative P/E of -12.96, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AZO at 25.62 trades on solid profitability.
• W shows a negative forward PEG of -0.21, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AZO at 2.13 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
• Book value is underwater for both AZO (-14.98) and W (-1.65), meaning liabilities exceed assets—signaling a critical solvency risk for both companies.

Dividend Comparison

Neither AZO nor W currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and W, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.83, both AZO and W have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
• Both AZO (quick ratio 0.13) and W (quick ratio 0.79) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
• Both AZO (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77) and W (-1.39) exhibit negative shareholder equity—assets fall short of liabilities—signaling serious balance-sheet stress.
• W carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.14, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AZO at 0.68 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
• AZO meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.90). In stark contrast, W’s negative ratio (-15.09) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.