Seek Returns logo

AZO vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AZO and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AZO’s market capitalization of 63.05 billion USD is substantially larger than TPR’s 18.73 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

TPR carries a higher beta at 1.48, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO (beta: 0.40) exhibits greater stability.

SymbolAZOTPR
Company NameAutoZone, Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorConsumer CyclicalConsumer Cyclical
IndustrySpecialty RetailLuxury Goods
CEOPhilip B. Daniele IIIJoanne C. Crevoiserat
Price3,769.26 USD90.2 USD
Market Cap63.05 billion USD18.73 billion USD
Beta0.401.48
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateApril 2, 1991October 6, 2000
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AZO and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AZO vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AZO

-57.43%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
70.52%
Q3
29.03%
Median
10.90%
Q1
-7.86%
Min
-57.43%

AZO has a negative Return on Equity of -57.43%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TPR

39.48%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
39.48%
Q3
11.43%
Median
2.25%
Q1
-9.11%
Min
-9.11%

In the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Equity of 39.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AZO

15.20%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
13.75%
Median
8.05%
Q1
0.80%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, AZO’s Return on Invested Capital of 15.20% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

TPR

16.71%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
16.71%
Q3
1.02%
Median
-6.91%
Q1
-28.22%
Min
-28.69%

In the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.71% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AZO

13.56%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
8.49%
Median
3.43%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-9.88%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.56% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TPR

12.50%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
0.63%
Q3
0.63%
Median
-4.31%
Q1
-6.60%
Min
-6.60%

TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AZO

19.63%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
24.47%
Q3
11.10%
Median
5.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-12.62%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.63% places AZO in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TPR

17.93%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
1.62%
Q3
1.62%
Median
-4.57%
Q1
-8.32%
Min
-16.93%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAZOTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)-57.43%39.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.77%11.77%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)15.20%16.71%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.56%12.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.63%17.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.95%73.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AZO

0.75

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.24
Q3
1.99
Median
1.42
Q1
1.02
Min
0.54

AZO’s Current Ratio of 0.75 falls into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TPR

1.76

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
1.85
Q3
1.76
Median
1.50
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.76 aligns with the median group of the Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AZO

-2.99

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.42
Median
0.87
Q1
0.35
Min
0.01

AZO has a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of -2.99, which indicates negative shareholder equity where liabilities exceed assets. This is a critical sign of financial distress.

TPR

2.75

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
8.43
Q3
4.17
Median
1.71
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

TPR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.75 is typical for the Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AZO

4.36

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
17.19
Median
4.28
Q1
0.11
Min
-23.60

AZO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Specialty Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

12.20

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
3.83
Median
-4.54
Q1
-6.01
Min
-7.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.20 is in the upper quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAZOTPR
Current Ratio (TTM)0.751.76
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.031.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)-2.992.75
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.640.56
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)2.332.15
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.3612.20

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AZO and TPR. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.54%
Q3
1.52%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.55%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
1.61%
Q3
1.44%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.55%, TPR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Luxury Goods industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AZO

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
177.64%
Q3
9.49%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AZO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TPR

35.71%

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
138.97%
Q3
35.71%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAZOTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AZO

24.62

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
81.45
Q3
42.51
Median
25.40
Q1
12.72
Min
1.88

AZO’s P/E Ratio of 24.62 is within the middle range for the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

21.75

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
82.17
Q3
66.88
Median
51.59
Q1
36.30
Min
21.01

In the lower quartile for the Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s P/E Ratio of 21.75 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AZO

2.12

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
2.79
Median
1.76
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

AZO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.12 is within the middle range of its peers in the Specialty Retail industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

TPR

1.29

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
8.34
Q3
3.44
Median
0.72
Q1
0.16
Min
0.05

TPR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.29 is within the middle range of its peers in the Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AZO

3.34

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.26
Q3
2.60
Median
1.29
Q1
0.41
Min
0.06

AZO’s P/S Ratio of 3.34 is in the upper echelon for the Specialty Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TPR

2.72

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
0.90
Q3
0.90
Median
0.65
Q1
0.50
Min
0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 2.72, TPR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Luxury Goods industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AZO

-15.88

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
12.73
Q3
6.96
Median
3.28
Q1
1.42
Min
0.24

AZO has a negative P/B Ratio of -15.88, indicating its liabilities exceed its assets and result in negative shareholder equity. This is a critical warning sign of financial distress.

TPR

12.52

Luxury Goods Industry

Max
12.09
Q3
7.26
Median
3.81
Q1
1.83
Min
1.41

At 12.52, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AZO vs. TPR: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Specialty Retail and Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAZOTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)24.6221.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)2.121.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)3.342.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)-15.8812.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)31.4921.00
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.9915.27
EV-to-Sales (TTM)3.953.17