AZO vs. SBUX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and SBUX, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With AZO at 64.78 billion USD and SBUX at 94.30 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
SBUX carries a higher beta at 0.98, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Starbucks Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Restaurants |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Brian R. Niccol |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 82.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 94.30 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | June 26, 1992 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and SBUX over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and SBUX based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Book value is underwater for both AZO (-14.98) and SBUX (-12.37), meaning liabilities exceed assets—signaling a critical solvency risk for both companies.
| Symbol | AZO | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 30.13 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 1.59 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 2.59 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | -12.37 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 30.79 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 18.50 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 3.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 38.41 |
Dividend Comparison
AZO offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while SBUX provides a 2.89% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AZO | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.89% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and SBUX, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.64, both AZO and SBUX have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AZO (quick ratio 0.13) and SBUX (quick ratio 0.45) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- Both AZO (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77) and SBUX (-3.41) exhibit negative shareholder equity—assets fall short of liabilities—signaling serious balance-sheet stress.
- SBUX carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 0.82, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while AZO at 0.68 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | AZO | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.64 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | -3.41 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 11.13 |