AZO vs. RIVN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

AZO dominates in value with a market cap of 64.78 billion USD, eclipsing RIVN’s 18.22 billion USD by roughly 3.56×.

RIVN carries a higher beta at 1.87, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AZO and RIVN over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and RIVN based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• RIVN shows a negative P/E of -4.73, highlighting a year of losses, whereas AZO at 25.62 trades on solid profitability.
• AZO has a negative P/B ratio of -14.98, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). RIVN, with a P/B of 2.92, maintains positive shareholder equity.
• RIVN reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -9.79, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AZO at 32.17 maintains positive cash flow.

Dividend Comparison

Neither AZO nor RIVN currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and RIVN, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• AZO’s current ratio of 0.84 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while RIVN at 3.73 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
• AZO’s quick ratio of 0.13 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas RIVN at 2.80 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
• AZO has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77), an unusual warning sign, while RIVN at 0.96 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
• AZO meets its interest obligations (ratio 7.90). In stark contrast, RIVN’s negative ratio (-12.25) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.