AZO vs. LVS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and LVS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AZO dominates in value with a market cap of 64.78 billion USD, eclipsing LVS’s 28.05 billion USD by roughly 2.31×.
LVS carries a higher beta at 0.98, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Robert Glen Goldstein |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 39.695 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 28.05 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 0.98 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | December 15, 2004 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and LVS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and LVS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AZO has a negative P/B ratio of -14.98, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). LVS, with a P/B of 10.47, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | AZO | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 21.67 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 2.47 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 2.50 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | 10.47 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 22.68 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 9.71 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 3.47 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 31.42 |
Dividend Comparison
AZO offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while LVS provides a 2.27% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AZO | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.27% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and LVS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.59, both AZO and LVS have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- Both AZO (quick ratio 0.13) and LVS (quick ratio 0.59) fall below 0.8, meaning their most liquid assets—excluding inventory—aren’t enough to meet short-term obligations. This could force them to rely on receivables, inventory turn, or external financing.
- AZO shows negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77), while LVS is heavily leveraged (5.13), illustrating two different balance-sheet risks.
| Symbol | AZO | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.59 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | 5.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 3.22 |