AZO vs. FLUT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and FLUT, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AZO dominates in value with a market cap of 64.78 billion USD, eclipsing FLUT’s 42.40 billion USD by roughly 1.53×.
FLUT carries a higher beta at 1.18, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Flutter Entertainment plc |
| Country | US | IE |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Jeremy Peter Jackson |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 239.96 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 42.40 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 1.18 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | October 4, 2002 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and FLUT over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and FLUT based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AZO has a negative P/B ratio of -14.98, indicating its liabilities exceed assets (negative equity). FLUT, with a P/B of 4.33, maintains positive shareholder equity.
| Symbol | AZO | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 68.89 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 2.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 2.96 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | 4.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 50.24 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 23.27 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 3.24 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 55.05 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AZO nor FLUT currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AZO | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and FLUT, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- With current ratios of 0.84 and 0.95, both AZO and FLUT have less current assets than short-term liabilities, which could strain their working capital and force reliance on additional financing.
- AZO’s quick ratio of 0.13 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas FLUT at 0.95 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- AZO has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77), an unusual warning sign, while FLUT at 0.75 maintains a conventional debt-to-equity balance.
| Symbol | AZO | FLUT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 0.95 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.30 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 2.21 |