AZO vs. BKNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AZO and BKNG, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
BKNG stands out with 172.25 billion USD in market value—about 2.66× AZO’s market cap of 64.78 billion USD.
BKNG carries a higher beta at 1.43, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AZO remains steadier at 0.44.
| Symbol | AZO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AutoZone, Inc. | Booking Holdings Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Cyclical |
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Travel Services |
| CEO | Mr. Philip B. Daniele III | Mr. Glenn D. Fogel |
| Price | 3,872.6 USD | 5,293.31 USD |
| Market Cap | 64.78 billion USD | 172.25 billion USD |
| Beta | 0.44 | 1.43 |
| Exchange | NYSE | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | April 2, 1991 | March 31, 1999 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AZO and BKNG over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AZO and BKNG based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Book value is underwater for both AZO (-14.98) and BKNG (-28.45), meaning liabilities exceed assets—signaling a critical solvency risk for both companies.
| Symbol | AZO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 25.62 | 31.97 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 2.19 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 3.47 | 7.15 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | -14.98 | -28.45 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 32.17 | 20.31 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 18.37 | 19.49 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 4.12 | 7.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 38.16 | 20.42 |
Dividend Comparison
AZO offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while BKNG provides a 0.68% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | AZO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.68% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AZO and BKNG, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AZO’s current ratio of 0.84 signals a possible liquidity squeeze, while BKNG at 1.22 comfortably covers its short-term obligations.
- AZO’s quick ratio of 0.13 suggests it may struggle to cover immediate liabilities without selling inventory or raising cash, whereas BKNG at 1.22 maintains a comfortable buffer of liquid assets.
- Both AZO (debt-to-equity ratio -2.77) and BKNG (-2.70) exhibit negative shareholder equity—assets fall short of liabilities—signaling serious balance-sheet stress.
| Symbol | AZO | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 0.84 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.13 | 1.22 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | -2.77 | -2.70 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.68 | 0.61 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 7.90 | 7.27 |