Seek Returns logo

AXON vs. RGEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AXON and RGEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

AXON’s market capitalization of 61.93 billion USD is substantially larger than RGEN’s 7.16 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.28 for AXON and 1.11 for RGEN, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolAXONRGEN
Company NameAxon Enterprise, Inc.Repligen Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorIndustrialsHealthcare
IndustryAerospace & DefenseMedical - Instruments & Supplies
CEOPatrick W. SmithOlivier Loeillot
Price795.48 USD127.47 USD
Market Cap61.93 billion USD7.16 billion USD
Beta1.281.11
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateJune 19, 2001April 29, 1986
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AXON and RGEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AXON vs. RGEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AXON

14.86%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
42.57%
Q3
16.67%
Median
8.39%
Q1
-0.77%
Min
-23.36%

AXON’s Return on Equity of 14.86% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RGEN

-1.27%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
26.65%
Q3
13.00%
Median
1.08%
Q1
-8.11%
Min
-38.20%

RGEN has a negative Return on Equity of -1.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AXON

0.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
23.42%
Q3
8.86%
Median
5.47%
Q1
-5.60%
Min
-22.46%

AXON’s Return on Invested Capital of 0.68% is in line with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

RGEN

-1.28%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
20.14%
Q3
7.36%
Median
1.97%
Q1
-6.22%
Min
-20.00%

RGEN has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -1.28%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AXON

14.86%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.67%
Q3
8.04%
Median
4.95%
Q1
-5.07%
Min
-16.58%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.86% places AXON in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RGEN

-3.93%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
28.95%
Q3
11.24%
Median
-2.83%
Q1
-12.85%
Min
-26.41%

RGEN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AXON

1.50%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.01%
Q3
11.49%
Median
8.96%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-4.96%

AXON’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.50% is in the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RGEN

-5.62%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
32.10%
Q3
16.03%
Median
2.28%
Q1
-7.96%
Min
-26.84%

RGEN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAXONRGEN
Return on Equity (TTM)14.86%-1.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.44%-0.89%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)0.68%-1.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.86%-3.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.50%-5.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.44%42.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AXON

2.83

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
5.13
Q3
3.36
Median
2.16
Q1
1.20
Min
0.41

AXON’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RGEN

6.79

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
4.57
Median
2.64
Q1
1.81
Min
1.10

RGEN’s Current Ratio of 6.79 is in the upper quartile for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AXON

0.80

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.20
Q3
0.73
Median
0.51
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

AXON’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Aerospace & Defense industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RGEN

0.34

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.16
Min
0.03

RGEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.34 is typical for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AXON

2.53

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
12.62
Q3
7.38
Median
2.95
Q1
1.68
Min
-6.68

AXON’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RGEN

-2.18

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
25.04
Q3
8.80
Median
3.66
Q1
-3.85
Min
-11.93

RGEN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.18. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAXONRGEN
Current Ratio (TTM)2.836.79
Quick Ratio (TTM)2.625.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.800.34
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.340.24
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)4.16-0.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.53-2.18

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AXON and RGEN. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AXON

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
6.00%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AXON currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RGEN

0.00%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
4.02%
Q3
0.38%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RGEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AXON

0.00%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
172.02%
Q3
32.47%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AXON has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RGEN

0.00%

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
76.77%
Q3
11.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RGEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAXONRGEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AXON

184.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
75.34
Q3
54.40
Median
38.63
Q1
26.10
Min
16.44

At 184.79, AXON’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RGEN

-281.96

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
45.65
Q3
44.10
Median
35.47
Q1
29.60
Min
21.65

RGEN has a negative P/E Ratio of -281.96. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AXON

8.54

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
10.68
Q3
5.36
Median
2.31
Q1
1.47
Min
0.01

A Forward PEG Ratio of 8.54 places AXON in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

RGEN

-9.47

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
5.80
Q3
3.68
Median
2.56
Q1
1.87
Min
0.22

RGEN has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -9.47. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AXON

27.81

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
19.34
Q3
9.54
Median
2.71
Q1
1.59
Min
0.35

With a P/S Ratio of 27.81, AXON trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RGEN

11.09

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
12.87
Q3
6.95
Median
3.45
Q1
2.24
Min
0.71

RGEN’s P/S Ratio of 11.09 is in the upper echelon for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AXON

23.93

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.08
Q3
8.12
Median
4.12
Q1
2.69
Min
0.69

At 23.93, AXON’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RGEN

3.60

Medical - Instruments & Supplies Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
5.48
Median
3.37
Q1
1.95
Min
0.65

RGEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.60 is within the conventional range for the Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AXON vs. RGEN: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Medical - Instruments & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAXONRGEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)184.79-281.96
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)8.54-9.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)27.8111.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)23.933.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)170.8060.90
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)274.0660.10
EV-to-Sales (TTM)28.2311.07