AVGO vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AVGO and WFC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AVGO dominates in value with a market cap of 1,080.18 billion USD, eclipsing WFC’s 238.17 billion USD by roughly 4.54×.
With betas of 1.06 for AVGO and 1.12 for WFC, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Broadcom Inc. | Wells Fargo & Company |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Financial Services |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Banks - Diversified |
| CEO | Mr. Hock E. Tan | Mr. Charles W. Scharf |
| Price | 229.73 USD | 73.19 USD |
| Market Cap | 1,080.18 billion USD | 238.17 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.06 | 1.12 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | August 6, 2009 | June 1, 1972 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AVGO and WFC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AVGO and WFC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AVGO stands out with a premium P/E of 107.08, while WFC at 12.01 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
- AVGO posts a negative forward PEG of -1.07, hinting at anticipated earnings decline, whereas WFC at 0.66 has projections for stable or growing earnings.
| Symbol | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 107.08 | 12.01 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.07 | 0.66 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 19.81 | 3.00 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 15.45 | 1.33 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 52.10 | 57.77 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 44.65 | 30.50 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 20.86 | 4.93 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 54.86 | 94.96 |
Dividend Comparison
WFC stands out with a 2.19% dividend yield—around 125% above AVGO’s 0.97%—highlighting its emphasis on generous payouts.
| Symbol | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.97% | 2.19% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AVGO and WFC, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- WFC’s current ratio of 0.25 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AVGO at 1.00 maintains healthy liquidity.
- WFC posts a quick ratio of 0.25, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AVGO at 0.91 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
| Symbol | AVGO | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 0.25 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.25 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 1.04 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.40 | 0.10 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.03 | 2.50 |