AVGO vs. CLSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AVGO and CLSK, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
AVGO dominates in value with a market cap of 1,080.18 billion USD, eclipsing CLSK’s 2.84 billion USD by roughly 380.30×.
CLSK carries a higher beta at 4.37, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AVGO remains steadier at 1.06.
| Symbol | AVGO | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Broadcom Inc. | CleanSpark, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Hock E. Tan | Mr. Zachary K. Bradford CPA |
| Price | 229.73 USD | 10.11 USD |
| Market Cap | 1,080.18 billion USD | 2.84 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.06 | 4.37 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | August 6, 2009 | November 16, 2016 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AVGO and CLSK over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AVGO and CLSK based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- AVGO trades at a lofty P/E of 107.08, implying strong growth expectations, in contrast to CLSK’s negative P/E of -15.82 driven by recent losses.
- Analysts assign negative forward PEG ratios to both AVGO (-1.07) and CLSK (-0.10), suggesting expectation of shrinking or negative earnings in the upcoming period—a worrying sign for their profit outlook.
- CLSK reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -2.60, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while AVGO at 52.10 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | AVGO | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 107.08 | -15.82 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | -1.07 | -0.10 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 19.81 | 5.29 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 15.45 | 1.59 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 52.10 | -2.60 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 44.65 | 60.44 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 20.86 | 5.11 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 54.86 | -2.52 |
Dividend Comparison
AVGO delivers a 0.97% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas CLSK appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | AVGO | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.97% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AVGO and CLSK, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AVGO meets its interest obligations (ratio 6.03). In stark contrast, CLSK’s negative ratio (-144.91) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | AVGO | CLSK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.00 | 8.67 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 8.67 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 0.00 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.40 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 6.03 | -144.91 |