Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and ZS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ZS’s market capitalization of 49.01 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to ZS (beta: 1.09), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURZS
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Zscaler, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOChristopher UrmsonJagtar Singh Chaudhry
Price5.3 USD314.77 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD49.01 billion USD
Beta2.601.09
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2021March 16, 2018
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and ZS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. ZS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ZS

-2.54%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

ZS has a negative Return on Equity of -2.54%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ZS

-9.81%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

ZS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -9.81%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

ZS

-1.52%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

ZS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.52%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

ZS

-4.84%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

ZS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.84%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURZS
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%-2.54%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%-0.73%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%-9.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)---1.52%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)---4.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--77.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ZS

1.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

ZS’s Current Ratio of 1.24 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ZS

0.68

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ZS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

ZS

-12.23

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

ZS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -12.23. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURZS
Current Ratio (TTM)9.541.24
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.541.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.68
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.23
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.07-7.62
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---12.23

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and ZS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZS

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZS

0.00%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ZS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURZS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ZS

-1,257.43

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

ZS has a negative P/E Ratio of -1,257.43. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ZS

-61.99

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

ZS has a negative Forward PEG Ratio of -61.99. This typically results from negative earnings or forecasts of declining future earnings, making the ratio not meaningful for valuation.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

ZS

19.24

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 19.24, ZS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

ZS

27.02

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

AUR vs. ZS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURZS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.69-1257.43
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.45-61.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--19.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.1827.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7067.08
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.82482.72
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--18.94