AUR vs. ZS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and ZS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ZS stands out with 38.48 billion USD in market value—about 3.59× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to ZS’s calmer 1.14, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Zscaler, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Jagtar Singh Chaudhry |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 248.72 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 38.48 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 1.14 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | March 16, 2018 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and ZS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and ZS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor ZS turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -2461.29, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- ZS shows a negative forward PEG of -183.93, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AUR at 0.51 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- AUR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -16.83, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, ZS (P/FCF 52.41) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | AUR | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -2461.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | -183.93 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 15.89 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 23.78 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | 52.41 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | 357.47 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 15.67 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | 51.71 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor ZS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and ZS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but ZS is in the red with interest coverage -8.67, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | ZS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.20 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 1.20 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.77 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.25 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -8.67 |