AUR vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at AUR and TTWO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
TTWO stands out with 40.02 billion USD in market value—about 3.73× AUR’s market cap of 10.72 billion USD.
AUR’s beta of 2.77 points to much larger expected swings compared to TTWO’s calmer 1.09, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | AUR | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Aurora Innovation, Inc. | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D. | Mr. Strauss H. Zelnick Esq., J.D. |
| Price | 6.06 USD | 226.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 10.72 billion USD | 40.02 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.77 | 1.09 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | May 10, 2021 | April 15, 1997 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of AUR and TTWO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and TTWO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither AUR nor TTWO turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -13.36 and -8.95, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- TTWO shows a negative forward PEG of -0.30, signaling expected earnings contraction, while AUR at 0.51 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- AUR and TTWO both consumed more free cash flow than they generated last year—P/FCF of -16.83 and -80.92, respectively—highlighting persistent liquidity pressure.
| Symbol | AUR | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -13.36 | -8.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | -0.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 0.00 | 7.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.92 | 18.75 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -16.83 | -80.92 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -13.53 | -11.55 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 0.00 | 7.13 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -16.74 | -81.17 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither AUR nor TTWO currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | AUR | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and TTWO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- TTWO’s current ratio of 0.78 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas AUR at 9.54 maintains healthy liquidity.
- TTWO posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while AUR at 9.54 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- AUR shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but TTWO is in the red with interest coverage -86.19, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | AUR | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 9.54 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.06 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -86.19 |