Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. KLAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AUR and KLAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

KLAC’s market capitalization of 122.27 billion USD is significantly greater than AUR’s 9.37 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

AUR’s beta of 2.60 points to significantly higher volatility compared to KLAC (beta: 1.39), suggesting AUR has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

SymbolAURKLAC
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.KLA Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSemiconductors
CEOChristopher UrmsonRichard P. Wallace
Price5.3 USD924.58 USD
Market Cap9.37 billion USD122.27 billion USD
Beta2.601.39
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2021October 8, 1980
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AUR and KLAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AUR vs. KLAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

AUR

-42.79%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
23.27%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.22%
Min
-26.63%

AUR has a negative Return on Equity of -42.79%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

KLAC

101.82%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

KLAC’s Return on Equity of 101.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

AUR

-40.98%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
28.29%
Q3
13.19%
Median
7.24%
Q1
0.23%
Min
-18.82%

AUR has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -40.98%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

KLAC

36.26%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

KLAC’s Return on Invested Capital of 36.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates an outstanding ability to deploy capital efficiently and create significant value.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
20.47%
Q3
11.62%
Median
5.97%
Q1
1.89%
Min
-4.62%

Net Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

KLAC

32.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.00% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
29.42%
Q3
14.75%
Median
8.92%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-11.92%

Operating Profit Margin data for AUR is currently unavailable.

KLAC

40.83%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 40.83% places KLAC in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAURKLAC
Return on Equity (TTM)-42.79%101.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)-38.19%24.33%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)-40.98%36.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)--32.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)--40.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--60.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

AUR

9.54

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.37
Median
1.58
Q1
1.20
Min
0.00

AUR’s Current Ratio of 9.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Information Technology Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KLAC

2.54

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

KLAC’s Current Ratio of 2.54 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

AUR

0.06

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.16
Median
0.48
Q1
0.09
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KLAC

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52, KLAC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
17.52
Q3
10.04
Median
4.66
Q1
0.80
Min
-10.50

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

KLAC

15.12

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

KLAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAURKLAC
Current Ratio (TTM)9.542.54
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.541.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.061.52
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.060.40
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)0.070.87
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--15.12

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for AUR and KLAC. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
16.57%
Q3
1.39%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KLAC

0.73%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Yield of 0.73% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

AUR

0.00%

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
112.81%
Q3
20.98%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KLAC

22.95%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KLAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.95% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAURKLAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

AUR

-11.69

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
49.12
Q3
36.91
Median
24.84
Q1
15.88
Min
1.55

AUR has a negative P/E Ratio of -11.69. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

KLAC

33.18

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

KLAC’s P/E Ratio of 33.18 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

AUR

0.45

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
3.79
Median
2.23
Q1
1.19
Min
0.03

In the lower quartile for the Information Technology Services industry, AUR’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.45 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

KLAC

2.67

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

AUR

--

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
8.15
Q3
4.17
Median
2.14
Q1
1.00
Min
0.10

P/S Ratio data for AUR is currently unavailable.

KLAC

10.59

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

KLAC’s P/S Ratio of 10.59 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

AUR

5.18

Information Technology Services Industry

Max
11.78
Q3
6.14
Median
3.23
Q1
1.97
Min
0.42

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Information Technology Services industry.

KLAC

30.62

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 30.62, KLAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AUR vs. KLAC: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Information Technology Services and Semiconductors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAURKLAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-11.6933.18
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.452.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)--10.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.1830.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-14.7034.80
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-11.8225.94
EV-to-Sales (TTM)--10.95