Seek Returns logo

AUR vs. CDNS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated

Here’s a clear look at AUR and CDNS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.

Company Overview

CDNS towers over AUR with a market cap of 86.70 billion USD, roughly 8.09 times the 10.72 billion USD of its peer.

AUR rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.77, hinting at bigger swings than CDNS’s steadier 1.04.

SymbolAURCDNS
Company NameAurora Innovation, Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
CountryUSUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - Application
CEOMr. Christopher Urmson Ph.D.Dr. Anirudh Devgan Ph.D.
Price6.06 USD317.55 USD
Market Cap10.72 billion USD86.70 billion USD
Beta2.7721.045
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMay 10, 2021June 10, 1987
ADRNoNo

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of AUR and CDNS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of AUR and CDNS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

  • AUR has a negative P/E of -13.36, indicating it’s been unprofitable over the past year with no net earnings to support its stock price. On the other hand, CDNS at 79.86 has maintained positive earnings, showing a healthier profit profile.
  • AUR shows a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -16.83, meaning it’s been burning through cash faster than it can produce it over the past twelve months—a troubling sign for its financial resilience. On the flip side, CDNS at 62.91 has managed to keep its cash flow in positive territory.
SymbolAURCDNS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)-13.3679.86
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)0.5111.04
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)0.0017.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)5.9218.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-16.8362.91
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)-13.5352.69
EV-to-Sales (TTM)0.0017.73
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM)-16.7462.69

Dividend Comparison

Neither AUR nor CDNS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.

SymbolAURCDNS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of AUR and CDNS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

  • AUR posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while CDNS at 21.78 handles interest with solid earnings.
SymbolAURCDNS
Current Ratio (TTM)9.543.07
Quick Ratio (TTM)9.542.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.060.52
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM)0.060.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--21.78