Seek Returns

AU vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at AU and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAUMLM
Company NameAngloGold Ashanti plcMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS Industry GroupMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningConstruction Materials
GICS Sub-IndustryGoldConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization51.61 billion USD34.63 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 5, 1998February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

AU’s market capitalization stands at 51.61 billion USD, while MLM’s is 34.63 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AU and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AU
MLM
Loading price history…
AU vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
5-Day Price Return2.14%-5.58%
13-Week Price Return-5.75%-16.47%
26-Week Price Return52.70%-7.06%
52-Week Price Return148.41%5.08%
Month-to-Date Return9.22%-6.13%
Year-to-Date Return20.04%-6.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.43M0.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.94M0.51M
3-Month Volatility64.93%29.69%
Beta0.661.14

MLM carries a higher beta at 1.14, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while AU (beta: 0.66) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AU

35.18%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
45.91%
Q3
22.01%
Median
12.32%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-16.35%

In the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, AU’s Return on Equity of 35.18% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MLM

25.07%

Construction Materials Industry
Max
28.78%
Q3
20.46%
Median
13.05%
Q1
5.54%
Min
2.78%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, MLM’s Return on Equity of 25.07% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AU

26.65%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
65.55%
Q3
29.40%
Median
13.47%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-20.48%

AU’s Net Profit Margin of 26.65% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MLM

38.67%

Construction Materials Industry
Max
18.70%
Q3
16.26%
Median
9.65%
Q1
3.69%
Min
2.70%

MLM’s Net Profit Margin of 38.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction Materials industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AU

41.75%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
92.03%
Q3
44.23%
Median
22.20%
Q1
6.92%
Min
-39.91%

AU’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.75% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MLM

22.37%

Construction Materials Industry
Max
23.68%
Q3
21.47%
Median
14.20%
Q1
9.35%
Min
7.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.37% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)35.18%25.07%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.36%13.35%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.65%38.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.75%22.37%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.27%29.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AU

2.87

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
5.33
Q3
3.73
Median
2.73
Q1
1.85
Min
0.54

AU’s Current Ratio of 2.87 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MLM

2.28

Construction Materials Industry
Max
2.59
Q3
2.43
Median
2.02
Q1
1.57
Min
0.83

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AU

0.28

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
1.06
Q3
0.50
Median
0.27
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

AU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.28 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MLM

0.47

Construction Materials Industry
Max
1.18
Q3
0.78
Median
0.54
Q1
0.49
Min
0.26

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry, MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.47 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AU

--

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
42.22
Q3
23.64
Median
6.35
Q1
1.83
Min
-13.32

Interest Coverage Ratio data for AU is currently unavailable.

MLM

6.57

Construction Materials Industry
Max
8.89
Q3
8.56
Median
7.14
Q1
5.97
Min
5.36

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.872.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.201.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.280.47
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--6.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-5.34%0.67%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)35.82%-1.28%
3-Year Revenue CAGR30.02%-0.06%
5-Year Revenue CAGR16.58%5.39%

EPS Growth

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)6.41%1,217.30%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)82.47%141.46%
3-Year EPS CAGR110.69%10.60%
5-Year EPS CAGR16.99%10.18%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AU

3.62%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
3.21%
Q3
1.35%
Median
0.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Yield of 3.62% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MLM

0.58%

Construction Materials Industry
Max
0.73%
Q3
0.69%
Median
0.57%
Q1
0.26%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AU

70.98%

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
70.98%
Q3
32.06%
Median
14.82%
Q1
0.35%
Min
0.00%

AU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.98% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MLM

7.85%

Construction Materials Industry
Max
27.21%
Q3
24.70%
Median
12.01%
Q1
7.74%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 7.85% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.62%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)70.98%7.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AU

19.61

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
53.79
Q3
31.95
Median
21.37
Q1
16.37
Min
5.95

AU’s P/E Ratio of 19.61 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MLM

13.62

Construction Materials Industry
Max
45.10
Q3
44.63
Median
32.00
Q1
17.31
Min
13.73

MLM’s P/E Ratio of 13.62 is below the typical range for the Construction Materials industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AU

5.23

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
10.75
Q3
6.06
Median
3.29
Q1
1.47
Min
0.19

AU’s P/S Ratio of 5.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MLM

5.27

Construction Materials Industry
Max
5.31
Q3
3.59
Median
2.65
Q1
2.00
Min
1.21

MLM’s P/S Ratio of 5.27 is in the upper echelon for the Construction Materials industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AU

5.39

Metals & Mining Industry
Max
6.54
Q3
4.10
Median
2.81
Q1
1.86
Min
0.41

AU’s P/B Ratio of 5.39 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MLM

3.14

Construction Materials Industry
Max
4.44
Q3
3.67
Median
3.05
Q1
1.80
Min
1.37

MLM’s P/B Ratio of 3.14 is within the conventional range for the Construction Materials industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AU vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAUMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.6113.62
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.235.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.393.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.2733.37