Seek Returns logo

ATO vs. LNT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATO and LNT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ATO’s market capitalization of 24.19 billion USD is substantially larger than LNT’s 15.81 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 0.70 for ATO and 0.58 for LNT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

SymbolATOLNT
Company NameAtmos Energy CorporationAlliant Energy Corporation
CountryUSUS
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryRegulated GasRegulated Electric
CEOJohn Kevin AkersLisa M. Barton
Price152.28 USD61.53 USD
Market Cap24.19 billion USD15.81 billion USD
Beta0.700.58
ExchangeNYSENASDAQ
IPO DateDecember 28, 1983January 5, 1988
ADRNoNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATO and LNT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATO vs. LNT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ATO

9.05%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
11.45%
Median
9.01%
Q1
7.53%
Min
6.41%

ATO’s Return on Equity of 9.05% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Gas industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNT

10.70%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
18.07%
Q3
12.49%
Median
10.00%
Q1
8.48%
Min
5.02%

LNT’s Return on Equity of 10.70% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ATO

4.73%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
8.99%
Q3
5.97%
Median
4.43%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.73% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Gas industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

LNT

5.26%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
5.26%
Q3
4.57%
Median
3.97%
Q1
3.33%
Min
1.92%

In the upper quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, LNT’s Return on Invested Capital of 5.26% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ATO

25.35%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
25.35%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.48%
Q1
4.66%
Min
-6.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.35% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LNT

18.26%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
22.24%
Q3
15.98%
Median
13.10%
Q1
11.03%
Min
3.79%

A Net Profit Margin of 18.26% places LNT in the upper quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ATO

33.30%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
45.15%
Q3
28.16%
Median
19.42%
Q1
14.26%
Min
3.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.30% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LNT

22.58%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
31.57%
Q3
25.65%
Median
21.93%
Q1
17.87%
Min
8.99%

LNT’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.58% is around the midpoint for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATOLNT
Return on Equity (TTM)9.05%10.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.21%3.26%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.73%5.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%18.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.30%22.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%45.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ATO

1.33

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.15
Median
1.00
Q1
0.69
Min
0.38

ATO’s Current Ratio of 1.33 is in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LNT

0.34

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
1.48
Q3
1.06
Median
0.86
Q1
0.73
Min
0.28

LNT’s Current Ratio of 0.34 falls into the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ATO

0.65

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.53
Median
1.38
Q1
0.83
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Regulated Gas industry, ATO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LNT

1.50

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.65
Q1
1.28
Min
0.27

LNT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.50 is typical for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ATO

8.02

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
3.07
Median
2.65
Q1
1.77
Min
1.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.02, ATO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Regulated Gas industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LNT

2.00

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.63
Median
2.41
Q1
2.30
Min
1.87

In the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, LNT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATOLNT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.330.34
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.250.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.651.50
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.320.47
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.495.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.022.00

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ATO and LNT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ATO

2.24%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
4.15%
Median
4.00%
Q1
2.73%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Yield of 2.24% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

LNT

3.21%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
6.60%
Q3
4.03%
Median
3.30%
Q1
3.06%
Min
0.00%

LNT’s Dividend Yield of 3.21% is consistent with its peers in the Regulated Electric industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ATO

46.20%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
87.89%
Q3
74.00%
Median
60.41%
Q1
45.73%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.20% is within the typical range for the Regulated Gas industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LNT

66.98%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
123.06%
Q3
69.07%
Median
62.27%
Q1
52.66%
Min
0.00%

LNT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.98% is within the typical range for the Regulated Electric industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATOLNT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.24%3.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.20%66.98%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ATO

21.32

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
23.74
Q3
22.05
Median
16.86
Q1
15.06
Min
10.79

ATO’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LNT

21.21

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
26.46
Q3
21.71
Median
19.07
Q1
17.74
Min
12.74

LNT’s P/E Ratio of 21.21 is within the middle range for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ATO

3.14

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
3.36
Median
3.17
Q1
2.55
Min
2.21

ATO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.14 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

LNT

2.96

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
3.10
Median
2.78
Q1
2.34
Min
1.46

LNT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.96 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ATO

5.39

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
2.16
Median
1.35
Q1
1.06
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 5.39, ATO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Regulated Gas industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

LNT

3.87

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.88
Q3
3.19
Median
2.68
Q1
1.96
Min
0.27

LNT’s P/S Ratio of 3.87 is in the upper echelon for the Regulated Electric industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ATO

1.84

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.88
Median
1.55
Q1
1.24
Min
1.10

ATO’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the Regulated Gas industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LNT

2.23

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.95
Q3
2.37
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.55

LNT’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is within the conventional range for the Regulated Electric industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ATO vs. LNT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATOLNT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)21.3221.21
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.142.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.393.87
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.842.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-18.5314.25
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.0914.28
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.176.47