Seek Returns logo

ATO vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATO and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ATO’s market capitalization stands at 24.19 billion USD, while KEP’s is 17.17 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 0.70 for ATO and 0.63 for KEP, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

KEP is an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), allowing U.S. investors direct exposure to its non-U.S. operations. ATO, on the other hand, is a domestic entity.

SymbolATOKEP
Company NameAtmos Energy CorporationKorea Electric Power Corporation
CountryUSKR
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryRegulated GasRegulated Electric
CEOJohn Kevin AkersDong-Cheol Kim
Price152.28 USD13.37 USD
Market Cap24.19 billion USD17.17 billion USD
Beta0.700.63
ExchangeNYSENYSE
IPO DateDecember 28, 1983October 27, 1994
ADRNoYes

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATO and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATO vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ATO

9.05%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
11.45%
Median
9.01%
Q1
7.53%
Min
6.41%

ATO’s Return on Equity of 9.05% is on par with the norm for the Regulated Gas industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP

13.53%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
18.07%
Q3
12.49%
Median
10.00%
Q1
8.48%
Min
5.02%

In the upper quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, KEP’s Return on Equity of 13.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ATO

4.73%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
8.99%
Q3
5.97%
Median
4.43%
Q1
0.25%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.73% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Gas industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

KEP

3.70%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
5.26%
Q3
4.57%
Median
3.97%
Q1
3.33%
Min
1.92%

KEP’s Return on Invested Capital of 3.70% is in line with the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ATO

25.35%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
25.35%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.48%
Q1
4.66%
Min
-6.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 25.35% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KEP

5.63%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
22.24%
Q3
15.98%
Median
13.10%
Q1
11.03%
Min
3.79%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.63% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ATO

33.30%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
45.15%
Q3
28.16%
Median
19.42%
Q1
14.26%
Min
3.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.30% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KEP

11.50%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
31.57%
Q3
25.65%
Median
21.93%
Q1
17.87%
Min
8.99%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.50% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Return on Equity (TTM)9.05%13.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.21%2.12%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)4.73%3.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.35%5.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.30%11.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.44%14.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ATO

1.33

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.15
Median
1.00
Q1
0.69
Min
0.38

ATO’s Current Ratio of 1.33 is in the upper quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KEP

0.47

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
1.48
Q3
1.06
Median
0.86
Q1
0.73
Min
0.28

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ATO

0.65

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.53
Median
1.38
Q1
0.83
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Regulated Gas industry, ATO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KEP

0.52

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.65
Q1
1.28
Min
0.27

Falling into the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry, KEP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ATO

8.02

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
3.07
Median
2.65
Q1
1.77
Min
1.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.02, ATO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Regulated Gas industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

KEP

2.33

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.07
Q3
2.63
Median
2.41
Q1
2.30
Min
1.87

KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.33 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Regulated Electric industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Current Ratio (TTM)1.330.47
Quick Ratio (TTM)1.250.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.650.52
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.320.09
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)3.491.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.022.33

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ATO and KEP. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ATO

2.24%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
6.99%
Q3
4.15%
Median
4.00%
Q1
2.73%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Yield of 2.24% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

KEP

0.00%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
6.60%
Q3
4.03%
Median
3.30%
Q1
3.06%
Min
0.00%

KEP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ATO

46.20%

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
87.89%
Q3
74.00%
Median
60.41%
Q1
45.73%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.20% is within the typical range for the Regulated Gas industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP

0.82%

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
123.06%
Q3
69.07%
Median
62.27%
Q1
52.66%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.82% is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.24%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.20%0.82%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ATO

21.32

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
23.74
Q3
22.05
Median
16.86
Q1
15.06
Min
10.79

ATO’s P/E Ratio of 21.32 is within the middle range for the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KEP

4.46

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
26.46
Q3
21.71
Median
19.07
Q1
17.74
Min
12.74

KEP’s P/E Ratio of 4.46 is below the typical range for the Regulated Electric industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ATO

3.14

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
3.36
Median
3.17
Q1
2.55
Min
2.21

ATO’s Forward PEG Ratio of 3.14 is within the middle range of its peers in the Regulated Gas industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

KEP

1.00

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
3.10
Median
2.78
Q1
2.34
Min
1.46

KEP’s Forward PEG Ratio of 1.00 is below the typical range for the Regulated Electric industry. This is a strong indicator that the stock may be undervalued, as its price appears low given its future growth prospects.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ATO

5.39

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
2.16
Median
1.35
Q1
1.06
Min
0.32

With a P/S Ratio of 5.39, ATO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Regulated Gas industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KEP

0.25

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
3.88
Q3
3.19
Median
2.68
Q1
1.96
Min
0.27

KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 falls below the typical floor for the Regulated Electric industry. This could suggest the stock is overlooked or deeply undervalued relative to its sales, but may also reflect significant market concerns about its future.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ATO

1.84

Regulated Gas Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.88
Median
1.55
Q1
1.24
Min
1.10

ATO’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the Regulated Gas industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KEP

0.56

Regulated Electric Industry

Max
2.95
Q3
2.37
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.55

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.56 is in the lower quartile for the Regulated Electric industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Regulated Gas and Regulated Electric industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)21.324.46
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)3.141.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)5.390.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)1.840.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)-18.5311.09
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)14.092.36
EV-to-Sales (TTM)7.170.46