Seek Returns logo

ATO vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ATO and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ATO is a standard domestic listing, while KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolATOKEP
Company NameAtmos Energy CorporationKorea Electric Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesSouth Korea
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryGas UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization26.66 billion USD17.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 28, 1983October 27, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ATO and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ATO vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
5-Day Price Return-0.02%-5.18%
13-Week Price Return3.82%32.04%
26-Week Price Return12.24%81.60%
52-Week Price Return28.34%-7.95%
Month-to-Date Return6.52%-2.72%
Year-to-Date Return19.26%87.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.06M5.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.99M4.51M
3-Month Volatility16.01%66.58%
Beta0.740.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ATO

9.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
18.18%
Q3
12.37%
Median
9.24%
Q1
6.51%
Min
1.38%

ATO’s Return on Equity of 9.00% is on par with the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP

13.40%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

KEP’s Return on Equity of 13.40% is on par with the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

25.04%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.23%
Q3
10.38%
Median
6.30%
Q1
3.98%
Min
1.91%

ATO’s Net Profit Margin of 25.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

KEP

5.72%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 5.72% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ATO

33.00%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
48.27%
Q3
23.40%
Median
8.99%
Q1
6.80%
Min
-2.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.00% places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KEP

11.77%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.77% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Return on Equity (TTM)9.00%13.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.35%2.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)25.04%5.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.00%11.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.14%-19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.37

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.53
Median
0.95
Q1
0.68
Min
0.43

ATO’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Gas Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KEP

0.47

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

0.67

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.39
Median
1.01
Q1
0.58
Min
0.13

ATO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KEP

3.26

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.26. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ATO

8.53

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
14.35
Q3
11.25
Median
8.09
Q1
3.86
Min
1.26

ATO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Gas Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.370.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.250.30
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.673.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.532.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

ATO vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ATO vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ATO

2.02%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
11.34%
Q3
6.37%
Median
3.90%
Q1
1.99%
Min
0.00%

ATO’s Dividend Yield of 2.02% is consistent with its peers in the Gas Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KEP

0.53%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 0.53% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ATO

46.51%

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
200.45%
Q3
112.45%
Median
75.14%
Q1
45.50%
Min
18.85%

ATO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 46.51% is within the typical range for the Gas Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KEP

4.33%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.33% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.02%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)46.51%4.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ATO

23.01

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
25.10
Q3
19.98
Median
12.83
Q1
10.31
Min
7.43

A P/E Ratio of 23.01 places ATO in the upper quartile for the Gas Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

KEP

4.56

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 4.56 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ATO

5.76

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
5.56
Q3
2.60
Median
1.11
Q1
0.62
Min
0.33

With a P/S Ratio of 5.76, ATO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Gas Utilities industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

KEP

0.26

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ATO

1.83

Gas Utilities Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.96
Median
1.31
Q1
0.94
Min
0.36

ATO’s P/B Ratio of 1.83 is within the conventional range for the Gas Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KEP

0.33

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.33 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ATO vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Gas Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolATOKEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.014.56
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.760.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.830.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)319.914.97