ASTS vs. QBTS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and QBTS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASTS dwarfs QBTS in market cap, clocking in at 7.81 billion USD—about 1.76 times the 4.43 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASTS rides a wilder wave with a beta of 2.04, hinting at bigger swings than QBTS’s steadier 0.89.
Symbol | ASTS | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | D-Wave Quantum Inc. |
Country | US | CA |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Communication Equipment | Computer Hardware |
CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Dr. Alan E. Baratz Ph.D. |
Price | 23.83 USD | 15.36 USD |
Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 4.43 billion USD |
Beta | 2.044 | 0.886 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | December 11, 2020 |
ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and QBTS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and QBTS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Both ASTS at -16.37 and QBTS at -33.33 have negative P/E values over the past twelve months. This reflects consistent losses rather than profits, meaning their current operations aren’t generating positive net income—a situation that could challenge their financial stability if prolonged.
- Both ASTS at -21.60 and QBTS at -84.98 have negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow values. This reveals they’ve been consuming more cash than they generate over the past year—a persistent cash drain that could strain their ability to operate without external funding.
Symbol | ASTS | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -33.33 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 1.25 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 207.56 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 21.21 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | -84.98 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -30.97 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 193.69 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | -79.30 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor QBTS pays dividends, suggesting both reinvest all profits into growth—likely expansion or innovation—favoring long-term value over immediate income.
Symbol | ASTS | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and QBTS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- QBTS’s -28.05 sits under 1.5, where earnings hug interest costs too closely—a squeeze if income dips. Meanwhile, ASTS at 39.54 has room to breathe.
Symbol | ASTS | QBTS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 20.73 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 20.61 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.04 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -28.05 |