ASTS vs. MRVL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and MRVL, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
MRVL stands out with 53.10 billion USD in market value—about 6.80× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 1.82 for MRVL, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ASTS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Marvell Technology, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Matthew J. Murphy |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 61.47 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 53.10 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 1.82 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | June 30, 2000 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and MRVL over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and MRVL based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- Neither ASTS nor MRVL turned a profit—both carry negative P/E ratios of -16.37 and -60.13, underscoring continued losses that pressure their valuations.
- MRVL shows a negative forward PEG of -2.38, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASTS at 8.02 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, MRVL (P/FCF 38.19) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | -60.13 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | -2.38 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 9.21 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 3.96 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 38.19 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | -2268.86 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 9.80 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 40.63 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while MRVL provides a 0.39% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ASTS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.39% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and MRVL, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASTS meets its interest obligations (ratio 39.54). In stark contrast, MRVL’s negative ratio (-3.75) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ASTS | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.54 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.03 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.32 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -3.75 |