ASTS vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

With ASTS at 7.81 billion USD and FOUR at 5.89 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.

With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 1.80 for FOUR, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and FOUR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and FOUR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FOUR at 27.08 signals healthy earnings.
• ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FOUR (P/FCF 12.47) indicates positive free cash flow generation.

Dividend Comparison

Neither ASTS nor FOUR currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and FOUR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• FOUR is highly leveraged (debt-to-equity ratio 3.58), elevating both potential gains and risks, compared to ASTS at 0.02, which maintains a steadier capital structure.