ASTS vs. FICO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and FICO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
FICO stands out with 41.57 billion USD in market value—about 5.32× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
With betas of 2.04 for ASTS and 1.40 for FICO, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
| Symbol | ASTS | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Fair Isaac Corporation |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. William J. Lansing |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 1,707.94 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 41.57 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 1.40 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | July 22, 1987 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and FICO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and FICO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while FICO at 72.18 signals healthy earnings.
- FICO carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -37.06, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ASTS (P/B 6.96) has positive book value.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, FICO (P/FCF 60.17) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 72.18 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 22.59 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | -37.06 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 60.17 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 53.04 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 23.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 63.64 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ASTS nor FICO currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASTS | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and FICO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FICO has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.27), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ASTS at 0.02 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- FICO carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.39, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while ASTS at 0.01 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
| Symbol | ASTS | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 2.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 2.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | -2.27 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 1.39 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | 9.57 |