ASTS vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and ERIC, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ERIC stands out with 29.42 billion USD in market value—about 3.77× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to ERIC’s calmer 0.44, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ERIC is an ADR, letting U.S. buyers tap its non-U.S. business directly, unlike ASTS, which is purely domestic.
| Symbol | ASTS | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) |
| Country | US | SE |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Anthony F. Bartolo |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 8.86 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 29.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 0.44 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | August 24, 1981 |
| ADR | No | Yes |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and ERIC over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and ERIC based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS has a negative P/E (-16.37) due to recent losses. In contrast, ERIC commands a premium multiple of 175.26, signaling strong market confidence in its future earnings growth to justify this high valuation.
- ERIC shows a negative forward PEG of -63.14, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASTS at 8.02 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, ERIC (P/FCF 6.70) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 175.26 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | -63.14 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 1.13 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 3.28 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 6.70 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 6.10 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 1.12 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 6.64 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while ERIC provides a 3.28% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ASTS | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.28% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for ASTS and ERIC in the table below.
| Symbol | ASTS | ERIC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 1.09 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.49 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.15 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | 6.76 |