Seek Returns logo

ASTS vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASTS and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ASTS is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolASTSERIC
Company NameAST SpaceMobile, Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryUnited StatesSweden
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryDiversified Telecommunication ServicesCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization16.16 billion USD25.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 1, 2019August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASTS and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASTS vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASTSERIC
5-Day Price Return-10.19%1.36%
13-Week Price Return68.60%-10.72%
26-Week Price Return62.80%-11.99%
52-Week Price Return44.86%1.44%
Month-to-Date Return-15.46%4.32%
Year-to-Date Return113.03%-17.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.09M3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.06M6.34M
3-Month Volatility77.73%26.67%
Beta2.500.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASTS

-63.47%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
35.96%
Q3
14.90%
Median
8.29%
Q1
-0.99%
Min
-18.19%

ASTS has a negative Return on Equity of -63.47%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASTS

-7,213.88%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
28.40%
Q3
13.05%
Median
6.85%
Q1
-0.81%
Min
-18.76%

ASTS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7,213.88%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASTS

-5,539.51%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
37.46%
Q3
22.24%
Median
15.73%
Q1
9.79%
Min
2.06%

ASTS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5,539.51%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASTSERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)-63.47%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)-28.08%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7,213.88%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-5,539.51%10.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)49.35%47.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

8.23

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
1.63
Q3
1.14
Median
0.92
Q1
0.68
Min
0.16

ASTS’s Current Ratio of 8.23 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

0.57

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.06
Median
1.32
Q1
0.74
Min
0.11

Falling into the lower quartile for the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, ASTS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.57 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

-115.23

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
14.66
Q3
8.25
Median
3.53
Q1
1.47
Min
-2.60

ASTS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -115.23. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASTSERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)8.231.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)8.140.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.570.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-115.233.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASTS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ASTS vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASTS

0.00%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
10.34%
Q3
5.44%
Median
3.89%
Q1
1.73%
Min
0.00%

ASTS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.73%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

0.00%

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
270.06%
Q3
135.21%
Median
76.62%
Q1
35.06%
Min
0.00%

ASTS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASTSERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

--

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
33.39
Q3
23.91
Median
16.72
Q1
13.00
Min
4.13

P/E Ratio data for ASTS is currently unavailable.

ERIC

14.44

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 14.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASTS

3,302.29

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.60
Median
1.62
Q1
0.94
Min
0.35

With a P/S Ratio of 3,302.29, ASTS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

ERIC

1.02

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASTS

18.09

Diversified Telecommunication Services Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
3.45
Median
2.10
Q1
1.19
Min
0.32

At 18.09, ASTS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASTS vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Diversified Telecommunication Services and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASTSERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--14.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3,302.291.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.093.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--6.44