ASTS vs. CSCO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASTS and CSCO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
CSCO stands out with 251.43 billion USD in market value—about 32.19× ASTS’s market cap of 7.81 billion USD.
ASTS’s beta of 2.04 points to much larger expected swings compared to CSCO’s calmer 0.89, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
| Symbol | ASTS | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | AST SpaceMobile, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| CEO | Mr. Abel Avellan | Mr. Charles H. Robbins |
| Price | 23.83 USD | 63.2 USD |
| Market Cap | 7.81 billion USD | 251.43 billion USD |
| Beta | 2.04 | 0.89 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | November 1, 2019 | February 16, 1990 |
| ADR | No | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASTS and CSCO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASTS and CSCO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ASTS posts a negative P/E of -16.37, reflecting last year’s net loss, while CSCO at 25.69 signals healthy earnings.
- ASTS has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -21.60, signaling it consumed more cash than it produced over the last year—an important liquidity warning. In contrast, CSCO (P/FCF 18.64) indicates positive free cash flow generation.
| Symbol | ASTS | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | -16.37 | 25.69 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 8.02 | 3.65 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 1684.97 | 4.52 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 6.96 | 5.48 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | -21.60 | 18.64 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | -15.01 | 25.92 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 1500.29 | 4.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | -19.24 | 20.20 |
Dividend Comparison
ASTS offers a 0% dividend yield, suggesting it may be reinvesting available cash back into the business for future growth, while CSCO provides a 2.55% dividend yield, giving investors a steady income stream.
| Symbol | ASTS | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.55% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASTS and CSCO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- CSCO’s current ratio of 0.95 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ASTS at 10.62 maintains healthy liquidity.
- ASTS meets its interest obligations (ratio 39.54). In stark contrast, CSCO’s negative ratio (-13.99) means its operating earnings (EBIT) don't cover basic operations, let alone interest, signaling serious financial trouble.
| Symbol | ASTS | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.95 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 10.62 | 0.87 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.64 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 0.24 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 39.54 | -13.99 |