ASML vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and UBER, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs UBER in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 1.56 times the 185.42 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and UBER at 1.43 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while UBER sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Dara Khosrowshahi |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 88.67 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 185.42 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.433 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | May 10, 2019 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and UBER over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and UBER, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 15.10 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 0.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 4.09 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 8.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 23.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 27.56 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 4.22 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 24.58 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike UBER, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against UBER’s long-term focus.
| Symbol | ASML | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and UBER, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while UBER at 7.94 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.51 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.21 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 7.94 |