ASML vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and TTWO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing TTWO’s 40.02 billion USD by roughly 7.24×.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.09 for TTWO, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while TTWO remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Strauss H. Zelnick Esq., J.D. |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 226.76 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 40.02 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.09 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | April 15, 1997 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and TTWO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and TTWO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- TTWO shows a negative P/E of -8.95, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ASML at 29.38 trades on solid profitability.
- TTWO shows a negative forward PEG of -0.30, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASML at 1.80 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
- TTWO reports a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow ratio of -80.92, showing a cash flow shortfall that could threaten its operational sustainability, while ASML at 27.60 maintains positive cash flow.
| Symbol | ASML | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | -8.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -0.30 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.34 | 7.10 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 18.75 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.60 | -80.92 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.82 | -11.55 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 7.13 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | -81.17 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas TTWO appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and TTWO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- TTWO’s current ratio of 0.78 indicates its assets may not cover near-term debts, whereas ASML at 1.52 maintains healthy liquidity.
- TTWO posts a quick ratio of 0.78, indicating limited coverage of short-term debts from its most liquid assets—while ASML at 0.91 enjoys stronger liquidity resilience.
- ASML shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but TTWO is in the red with interest coverage -86.19, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ASML | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.75 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -86.19 |