ASML vs. TER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and TER, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs TER in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 22.88 times the 12.67 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and TER at 1.70 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while TER sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Teradyne, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Gregory Stephen Smith |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 78.98 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 12.67 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.7 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | September 14, 1970 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and TER over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and TER, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 22.10 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 0.69 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 4.36 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 3.44 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 20.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 17.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 4.22 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 20.15 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and TER at 0.46% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet ASML’s 0.98% yield, 116% above TER’s 0.46%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while TER leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and TER, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while TER at -6055.69 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.
| Symbol | ASML | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.70 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 2.17 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.02 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -6055.69 |