ASML vs. SNPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and SNPS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs SNPS in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 3.74 times the 77.54 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and SNPS at 1.16 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while SNPS sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
Symbol | ASML | SNPS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Synopsys, Inc. |
Country | NL | US |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Sassine Ghazi |
Price | 737.17 USD | 501.46 USD |
Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 77.54 billion USD |
Beta | 1.221 | 1.163 |
Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | February 26, 1992 |
ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and SNPS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and SNPS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- SNPS has a negative Forward PEG of -0.37, suggesting analysts predict either a drop in earnings or no profits at all in the near future—a red flag for its growth trajectory. Meanwhile, ASML at 1.80 avoids such a pessimistic forecast.
Symbol | ASML | SNPS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 36.70 |
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -0.37 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 12.77 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 8.32 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 59.47 |
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 51.32 |
EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 12.28 |
EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 57.17 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike SNPS, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against SNPS’s long-term focus.
Symbol | ASML | SNPS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and SNPS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while SNPS at 43.66 handles interest with solid earnings.
Symbol | ASML | SNPS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.68 |
Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 2.51 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.07 |
Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.05 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 43.66 |