Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. RIOT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and RIOT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than RIOT’s 4.35 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

RIOT carries a higher beta at 4.54, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASML (beta: 1.22) exhibits greater stability.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RIOT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLRIOT
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Riot Platforms, Inc.
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyFinancial Services
IndustrySemiconductorsFinancial - Capital Markets
CEOChristophe D. FouquetJason Les
Price794.5 USD12.17 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD4.35 billion USD
Beta1.224.54
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995March 31, 2016
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and RIOT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. RIOT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RIOT

-13.96%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.02%
Q3
20.69%
Median
13.73%
Q1
3.33%
Min
-21.32%

RIOT has a negative Return on Equity of -13.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

RIOT

-7.93%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
30.24%
Q3
13.34%
Median
6.20%
Q1
-1.71%
Min
-16.91%

Return on Invested Capital is often not a primary measure of capital efficiency in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RIOT

-86.92%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
28.67%
Q3
13.52%
Median
10.47%
Q1
0.24%
Min
-9.55%

RIOT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -86.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RIOT

-61.96%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
56.86%
Q3
25.29%
Median
15.90%
Q1
0.51%
Min
-19.18%

RIOT has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -61.96%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLRIOT
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%-13.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%-10.72%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%-7.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%-86.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%-61.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%31.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RIOT

3.23

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.60
Q3
3.24
Median
1.32
Q1
0.96
Min
0.05

For the Financial - Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RIOT

0.01

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.68
Median
0.37
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, RIOT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

RIOT

-36.30

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
12.71
Q3
7.94
Median
1.92
Q1
0.24
Min
-7.71

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLRIOT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.523.23
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.913.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.01
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.01
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.47-1.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---36.30

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and RIOT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RIOT

0.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
5.86%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIOT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RIOT

0.00%

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
128.06%
Q3
43.11%
Median
12.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIOT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLRIOT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RIOT

-10.06

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
42.65
Q3
29.09
Median
20.52
Q1
14.58
Min
8.28

RIOT has a negative P/E Ratio of -10.06. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

RIOT

0.03

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
4.05
Q3
2.46
Median
1.52
Q1
0.78
Min
0.02

In the lower quartile for the Financial - Capital Markets industry, RIOT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.03 is a positive indicator. It suggests that the stock may be attractively valued relative to its expected earnings growth.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RIOT

9.48

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.34
Q3
7.63
Median
2.98
Q1
1.50
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial - Capital Markets industry.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RIOT

1.36

Financial - Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.60
Q3
6.00
Median
2.91
Q1
1.84
Min
0.53

RIOT’s P/B Ratio of 1.36 is in the lower quartile for the Financial - Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ASML vs. RIOT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Financial - Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLRIOT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.72-10.06
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.900.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.449.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.781.36
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.93-3.06
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0936.61
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.279.19