ASML vs. PLTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and PLTR, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
With ASML at 289.86 billion USD and PLTR at 284.56 billion USD, their market capitalizations sit in the same ballpark.
PLTR carries a higher beta at 2.68, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while ASML remains steadier at 1.22.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while PLTR remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Palantir Technologies Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Dr. Alexander C. Karp J.D. |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 120.58 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 284.56 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 2.68 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | September 30, 2020 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and PLTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and PLTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- PLTR features a high P/E of 496.25, indicating strong growth expectations, compared to ASML at 29.38, which trades at a more standard valuation based on its current earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | 496.25 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 28.93 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 91.35 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 52.21 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.61 | 215.84 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.83 | 661.99 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 91.11 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 215.27 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas PLTR appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and PLTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- Neither ASML nor PLTR records interest coverage (both “--”), indicating virtually no interest expense—usually a sign of negligible debt.
| Symbol | ASML | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 6.49 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 6.49 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.05 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -- |