ASML vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ASML and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ASML trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while PG is a standard domestic stock.

Symbol	ASML	PG
Company Name	ASML Holding N.V.	The Procter & Gamble Company
Country	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Consumer Staples
GICS Industry	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment	Household Products
Market Capitalization	296.29 billion USD	373.63 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqGS	NYSE
Listing Date	March 15, 1995	January 2, 1962
Security Type	NY Reg Shrs	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ASML	PG
5-Day Price Return	0.27%	3.75%
13-Week Price Return	-3.37%	-3.19%
26-Week Price Return	-12.28%	-6.73%
52-Week Price Return	-21.56%	-5.29%
Month-to-Date Return	4.76%	6.01%
Year-to-Date Return	-5.36%	-4.86%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.45M	7.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.68M	8.20M
3-Month Volatility	35.08%	14.84%
Beta	1.70	0.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASML

47.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 52.74%
Q3: 23.49%
Median: 11.60%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ASML’s Return on Equity of 47.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PG

30.78%

Household Products Industry

Max: 226.04%
Q3: 106.83%
Median: 17.55%
Q1: 9.51%
Min: -8.31%

PG’s Return on Equity of 30.78% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

29.31%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 44.17%
Q3: 22.38%
Median: 11.95%
Q1: 3.21%
Min: -25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.31% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PG

18.95%

Household Products Industry

Max: 12.48%
Q3: 10.54%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: 8.58%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 18.95% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

34.90%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 58.03%
Q3: 27.84%
Median: 12.45%
Q1: 5.15%
Min: -28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.90% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PG

23.32%

Household Products Industry

Max: 21.54%
Q3: 16.06%
Median: 13.28%
Q1: 12.03%
Min: 6.49%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.32% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ASML	PG
Return on Equity (TTM)	47.13%	30.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)	19.27%	12.85%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	29.31%	18.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	34.90%	23.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	52.58%	51.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

1.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 8.42
Q3: 4.70
Median: 2.75
Q1: 2.07
Min: 1.04

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PG

0.70

Household Products Industry

Max: 3.31
Q3: 2.04
Median: 1.21
Q1: 0.76
Min: 0.55

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.70 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

0.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 1.09
Q3: 0.45
Median: 0.22
Q1: 0.01
Min: 0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG

0.66

Household Products Industry

Max: 1.47
Q3: 1.47
Median: 0.49
Q1: 0.16
Min: 0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.66 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASML

164.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 174.00
Q3: 81.10
Median: 27.22
Q1: 7.28
Min: -4.26

ASML’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 164.15 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max: 83.52
Q3: 68.49
Median: 13.94
Q1: 9.41
Min: 4.76

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ASML	PG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.41	0.70
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.79	0.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.22	0.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	164.15	47.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ASML vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASML

1.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 4.16%
Q3: 1.78%
Median: 0.74%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PG

2.64%

Household Products Industry

Max: 5.40%
Q3: 3.85%
Median: 2.82%
Q1: 1.83%
Min: 0.00%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.64% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 196.12%
Q3: 87.72%
Median: 26.57%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.57% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PG

61.80%

Household Products Industry

Max: 191.34%
Q3: 102.63%
Median: 70.63%
Q1: 34.62%
Min: 0.00%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.80% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ASML	PG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.01%	2.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	26.57%	61.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 109.37
Q3: 57.11
Median: 28.95
Q1: 22.13
Min: 11.14

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 26.41 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PG

23.40

Household Products Industry

Max: 33.84
Q3: 22.61
Median: 18.73
Q1: 14.08
Min: 13.61

A P/E Ratio of 23.40 places PG in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASML

7.74

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 16.09
Q3: 10.10
Median: 4.82
Q1: 2.60
Min: 0.93

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 7.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PG

4.43

Household Products Industry

Max: 4.78
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.93
Q1: 1.27
Min: 0.73

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

12.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max: 13.56
Q3: 6.75
Median: 3.68
Q1: 1.89
Min: 0.60

ASML’s P/B Ratio of 12.39 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PG

7.14

Household Products Industry

Max: 14.28
Q3: 14.28
Median: 4.13
Q1: 1.75
Min: 1.42

PG’s P/B Ratio of 7.14 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ASML	PG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	26.41	23.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.74	4.43
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	12.39	7.14
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	26.67	26.61