ASML vs. PG: ASML vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison

Company Profile

ASML (ASML) is classified in the Information Technology sector (Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment), whereas Procter & Gamble (PG) belongs to Consumer Staples (Household & Personal Products) — their GICS classifications point to very different parts of the market.

Procter & Gamble (PG) trades as ordinary local shares, while ASML (ASML) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

ASML (ASML) has an aggressive beta of 1.80, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Procter & Gamble (PG) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

ASML (ASML) at 65.64% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Procter & Gamble (PG) at 29.61%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

For every dollar of sales, both ASML (ASML) at 34.14% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 18.23% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 26.87% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and ASML (ASML) at 44.36% also operates in the top quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.26% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ASML (ASML) at 15.58% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for PG.

Both ASML (ASML) at 28.43% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 1.69% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both ASML (ASML) at 1.49 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.72 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both ASML (ASML) at 0.09 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.70 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.57% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ASML (ASML) at 0.55% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PG the richer one.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 64.62% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ASML (ASML) at 22.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both ASML (ASML) at 35.06 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 24.91 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Both ASML (ASML) at 13.91 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 4.36 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 7.05 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while ASML (ASML) at 1,223.36 prices above its benchmark range — ASML looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics