ASML vs. NVDA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and NVDA, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
NVDA towers over ASML with a market cap of 3,214.29 billion USD, roughly 11.09 times the 289.86 billion USD of its peer.
NVDA dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 2.11, while ASML keeps it calmer at 1.22.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while NVDA sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | NVIDIA Corporation |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Jen-Hsun Huang |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 131.8 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 3,214.29 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 2.114 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | January 22, 1999 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and NVDA over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and NVDA, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 44.29 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 3.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 24.63 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 40.69 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 52.82 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 37.34 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 24.64 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 52.85 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and NVDA at 0.03% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet ASML’s 0.98% yield, 3141% above NVDA’s 0.03%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while NVDA leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.03% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and NVDA, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while NVDA at 329.77 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 4.44 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 3.88 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 329.77 |