ASML vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and MU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing MU’s 107.11 billion USD by roughly 2.71×.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.21 for MU, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while MU remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Sanjay Mehrotra |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 95.84 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 107.11 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.21 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 1, 1984 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and MU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and MU, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | 22.87 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 0.88 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.34 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 2.20 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.60 | 13.61 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.82 | 9.14 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 3.66 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 14.56 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s dividend yield of 0.98% is about 105% higher than MU’s 0.48%, underscoring its stronger focus on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.48% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and MU, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas MU (at 11.94) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 3.13 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.99 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.31 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 11.94 |