ASML vs. MSTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Company Overview

ASML dwarfs MSTR in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 2.63 times the 110.10 billion USD of its counterpart.

MSTR dances to a riskier tune, sporting a beta of 3.81, while ASML keeps it calmer at 1.22.

Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while MSTR sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.

Performance Comparison

This chart compares the performance of ASML and MSTR over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).

Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

Valuation Metrics Comparison

The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and MSTR based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.

• MSTR shows a negative P/E of -19.34, highlighting a year of losses with no net profit generated. Meanwhile, ASML at 29.33 has sustained positive earnings, offering a more stable earnings foundation.
• MSTR has a negative Price-to-Free Cash Flow of -5.36, indicating it’s spent more cash than it’s brought in over the past year—a cash flow shortfall that raises questions about its operational sustainability. Meanwhile, ASML at 27.56 maintains a positive cash position.

Dividend Comparison

ASML’s 0.98% yield offers steady income while retaining earnings for growth, unlike MSTR, which pays none, reinvesting fully—likely in expansion or R&D—for investors eyeing future gains. This pits ASML’s balanced approach against MSTR’s long-term focus.

Financial Strength Metrics Comparison

This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and MSTR, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.

• MSTR’s current ratio of 0.66 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ASML at 1.52 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
• At 0.66, MSTR’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, ASML hits 0.91, covering its bases comfortably.
• ASML’s interest coverage reads “--”, suggesting interest expenses are next to nothing—think tiny debt or ultra-low rates—while MSTR at -229.74 teeters below 1.5, earnings barely clearing interest.