Seek Returns logo

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

ASML vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here's a clear look at ASML and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolASMLMSFT
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Microsoft Corporation
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware & Services
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware
GICS Sub-IndustrySemiconductor Materials & EquipmentSystems Software
Market Capitalization580.46 billion USD2,756.45 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 15, 1995March 13, 1986
Security TypeNY Reg ShrsCommon Stock

ASML trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while MSFT is a standard domestic stock.

MSFT's market capitalization (2,756.45 billion USD) is significantly greater than ASML's (580.46 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
5-Day Price Return9.39%-0.54%
13-Week Price Return25.37%-23.29%
26-Week Price Return41.54%-28.31%
52-Week Price Return115.25%-5.02%
Month-to-Date Return13.47%0.19%
Year-to-Date Return37.83%-23.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M31.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.70M32.32M
3-Month Volatility44.98%31.78%
Beta1.761.09

ASML's beta of 1.76 points to significantly higher volatility compared to MSFT (beta: 1.09), suggesting ASML has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASML

52.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
48.79%
Q3
20.13%
Median
8.42%
Q1
0.74%
Min
-24.06%

ASML's Return on Equity of 52.14% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSFT

33.61%

Software Industry
Max
66.50%
Q3
25.41%
Median
12.65%
Q1
-3.84%
Min
-39.77%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT's Return on Equity of 33.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

29.42%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
45.10%
Q3
22.27%
Median
11.32%
Q1
0.95%
Min
-24.07%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.42% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT

39.04%

Software Industry
Max
48.76%
Q3
20.11%
Median
12.64%
Q1
-2.50%
Min
-35.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.04% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

34.60%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
60.38%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.97%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-25.47%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.60% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSFT

46.62%

Software Industry
Max
68.47%
Q3
25.57%
Median
13.86%
Q1
-3.24%
Min
-43.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.62% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)52.14%33.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)20.67%19.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.42%39.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.60%46.62%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.83%68.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

1.26

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
7.65
Q3
4.52
Median
3.01
Q1
2.26
Min
1.17

ASML's Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSFT

1.39

Software Industry
Max
3.83
Q3
2.33
Median
1.55
Q1
1.04
Min
0.47

MSFT's Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

0.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.25
Q3
0.54
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

ASML's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry
Max
2.40
Q3
1.00
Median
0.30
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT's Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASML

145.76

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
135.68
Q3
56.62
Median
14.83
Q1
2.60
Min
-37.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 145.76, ASML demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry
Max
44.00
Q3
17.44
Median
2.52
Q1
-7.25
Min
-36.57

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.261.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.791.38
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.140.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)145.76891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)4.92%16.72%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)15.58%16.67%
3-Year Revenue CAGR15.55%12.42%
5-Year Revenue CAGR18.50%14.52%

EPS Growth

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)7.23%59.69%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-12.31%28.74%
3-Year EPS CAGR20.47%12.24%
5-Year EPS CAGR23.85%18.80%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASML

0.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.98%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.39%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML's Dividend Yield of 0.54% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT

0.92%

Software Industry
Max
1.51%
Q3
0.63%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.92%, MSFT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
168.19%
Q3
72.81%
Median
24.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML's Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.54% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT

21.19%

Software Industry
Max
45.50%
Q3
19.02%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT's Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.19% is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.54%0.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.54%21.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASML

49.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
126.38
Q3
70.45
Median
49.08
Q1
30.76
Min
14.29

ASML's P/E Ratio of 49.08 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSFT

23.09

Software Industry
Max
73.42
Q3
46.11
Median
26.68
Q1
17.95
Min
10.36

MSFT's P/E Ratio of 23.09 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASML

14.44

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
29.76
Q3
14.44
Median
6.75
Q1
3.18
Min
1.15

ASML's P/S Ratio of 14.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT

9.02

Software Industry
Max
16.09
Q3
8.50
Median
4.78
Q1
3.14
Min
0.81

MSFT's P/S Ratio of 9.02 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

17.89

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
15.44
Q3
7.95
Median
3.99
Q1
1.98
Min
0.78

At 17.89, ASML's P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signifies that the market's valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT

9.20

Software Industry
Max
26.28
Q3
12.85
Median
6.90
Q1
3.63
Min
0.38

MSFT's P/B Ratio of 9.20 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock's price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.0823.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)14.449.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.899.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)41.0135.58