Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

MSFT’s market capitalization of 3,707.65 billion USD is significantly greater than ASML’s 312.40 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.03 for MSFT, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, MSFT is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLMSFT
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Microsoft Corporation
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSoftware - Infrastructure
CEOChristophe D. FouquetSatya Nadella
Price794.5 USD498.84 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD3,707.65 billion USD
Beta1.221.03
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995March 13, 1986
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSFT

32.74%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
80.61%
Q3
29.97%
Median
2.84%
Q1
-8.35%
Min
-56.26%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.74% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

MSFT

22.11%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
39.31%
Q3
11.97%
Median
1.67%
Q1
-7.10%
Min
-34.29%

In the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, MSFT’s Return on Invested Capital of 22.11% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT

35.79%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
46.46%
Q3
14.65%
Median
2.66%
Q1
-7.70%
Min
-35.45%

A Net Profit Margin of 35.79% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSFT

45.23%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.51%
Q3
16.56%
Median
4.48%
Q1
-6.43%
Min
-40.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.23% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%32.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%17.18%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%22.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%35.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%45.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%69.07%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSFT

1.37

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.25
Median
1.51
Q1
1.10
Min
0.23

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT

0.19

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.56
Q3
1.12
Median
0.33
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Software - Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

MSFT

49.43

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
32.21
Q3
5.24
Median
0.95
Q1
-17.99
Min
-50.82

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 49.43, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Current Ratio (TTM)1.521.37
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.911.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.19
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.470.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--49.43

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and MSFT. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT

0.65%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.07%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.65%, MSFT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT

24.30%

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
48.68%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.30% is in the upper quartile for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%24.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSFT

38.38

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
107.77
Q3
54.40
Median
28.10
Q1
18.03
Min
5.32

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 38.38 is within the middle range for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

MSFT

2.18

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
3.94
Median
2.13
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

MSFT’s Forward PEG Ratio of 2.18 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Infrastructure industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT

13.73

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
18.25
Q3
9.05
Median
4.77
Q1
2.30
Min
0.11

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.73 is in the upper echelon for the Software - Infrastructure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSFT

11.52

Software - Infrastructure Industry

Max
19.94
Q3
10.91
Median
6.33
Q1
2.95
Min
0.51

The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Infrastructure industry.

ASML vs. MSFT: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Software - Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7238.38
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.902.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.4413.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.7811.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9353.45
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0924.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.2713.85