ASML vs. MPWR: ASML vs. Monolithic Power Systems Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) both belong to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, though ASML is classified under Semiconductor Materials & Equipment while MPWR falls under Semiconductors.

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) trades as ordinary local shares, while ASML (ASML) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Profile Item	ASML	MPWR
Name	ASML Holding N.V. NY Registered Shares	Monolithic Power Systems Inc.
Country/Region	Netherlands	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry Group	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Industry	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-Industry	Semiconductor Materials & Equipment	Semiconductors
Market Capitalization	549.12 billion USD	58.06 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	Nasdaq
Listing Date	March 15, 1995	November 19, 2004
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ASML

MPWR

GSPC

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Total Return (1Y)	50.12%	42.29%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	34.80%	42.13%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	13.32%	20.48%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ASML

MPWR

GSPC

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	48.80%	57.22%
Beta (5Y)	1.80	1.67
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-56.47%	-51.65%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.42M	776.23K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

ASML and MPWR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.94	0.66
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.39	0.98

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both companies show strong equity returns, but ASML (ASML) at 65.64% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 24.47% also sits in the top quartile.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

65.64%

ASML: 65.64%
Max: 52.82%
Q3: 22.26%
Median: 10.58%
Q1: 1.29%
Min: -16.89%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

24.47%

Max: 52.82%
MPWR: 24.47%
Q3: 22.26%
Median: 10.58%
Q1: 1.29%
Min: -16.89%

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their ROE against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

ASML (ASML) at 34.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 23.89%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

34.14%

Max: 63.80%
ASML: 34.14%
Q3: 28.36%
Median: 11.44%
Q1: 0.90%
Min: -37.77%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

23.89%

Max: 63.80%
Q3: 28.36%
MPWR: 23.89%
Median: 11.44%
Q1: 0.90%
Min: -37.77%

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their net margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

ASML (ASML) at 44.36% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 29.75%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

44.36%

Max: 58.66%
ASML: 44.36%
Q3: 30.23%
Median: 15.91%
Q1: 7.54%
Min: -25.74%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

29.75%

Max: 58.66%
Q3: 30.23%
MPWR: 29.75%
Median: 15.91%
Q1: 7.54%
Min: -25.74%

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
ROE (TTM)	65.64%	24.47%
ROA (TTM)	18.28%	15.52%
Net Margin (TTM)	34.14%	23.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)	44.36%	29.75%
Gross Margin (TTM)	54.34%	55.26%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 26.43% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ASML (ASML) at 15.58% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for MPWR.

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

ASML (ASML) at 28.43% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at -64.85% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Revenue Growth (YoY)	15.58%	26.43%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	15.55%	15.86%
EPS Growth (YoY)	28.43%	-64.85%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	15.42%	12.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 3.70 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ASML (ASML) at 1.49 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ASML.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

1.49

Max: 10.33
Q3: 5.62
Median: 3.33
Q1: 2.35
ASML: 1.49
Min: 1.03

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

3.70

Max: 10.33
Q3: 5.62
MPWR: 3.70
Median: 3.33
Q1: 2.35
Min: 1.03

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their current ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ASML (ASML) at 0.09 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.09

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.27
ASML: 0.09
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.01

Max: 1.46
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.27
Q1: 0.04
MPWR: 0.01
Min: 0.00

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.49	3.70
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.09	0.01
Net Debt / EBITDA	-0.67	-0.92

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 0.67% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ASML (ASML) at 0.55% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, MPWR the richer one.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.55%

Max: 1.37%
Q3: 0.65%
ASML: 0.55%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

0.67%

Max: 1.37%
MPWR: 0.67%
Q3: 0.65%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ASML (ASML) at 22.26% and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 41.65% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

22.26%

Max: 49.64%
ASML: 22.26%
Q3: 21.71%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

41.65%

Max: 49.64%
MPWR: 41.65%
Q3: 21.71%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.55%	0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.26%	41.65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ASML (ASML) at 35.06 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 65.27 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

35.06

Max: 110.34
Q3: 66.81
Median: 37.02
ASML: 35.06
Q1: 23.96
Min: 8.12

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

65.27

Max: 110.34
Q3: 66.81
MPWR: 65.27
Median: 37.02
Q1: 23.96
Min: 8.12

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both ASML (ASML) at 13.91 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.53 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

13.91

Max: 21.42
ASML: 13.91
Q3: 12.27
Median: 5.76
Q1: 2.73
Min: 0.00

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.53

Max: 21.42
MPWR: 15.53
Q3: 12.27
Median: 5.76
Q1: 2.73
Min: 0.00

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both ASML (ASML) at 1,223.36 and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) at 15.56 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

ASML

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

1,223.36

ASML: 1,223.36
Max: 14.06
Q3: 7.44
Median: 4.29
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.20

MPWR

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group

15.56

MPWR: 15.56
Max: 14.06
Q3: 7.44
Median: 4.29
Q1: 2.30
Min: 0.20

ASML (ASML) vs. Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ASML (ASML) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR)
Metric	ASML	MPWR
P/E Ratio (TTM)	35.06	65.27
P/S Ratio (TTM)	13.91	15.53
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1,223.36	15.56
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	1.89%	0.87%