ASML vs. INTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and INTU, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength.
Company Overview
ASML’s market capitalization stands at 309.14 billion USD, while INTU’s is 213.73 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.28 for INTU, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, INTU is a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Intuit Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. Sasan K. Goodarzi |
| Price | 786.21 USD | 766.21 USD |
| Market Cap | 309.14 billion USD | 213.73 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.28 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | March 12, 1993 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and INTU over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
This section compares the market valuation of ASML and INTU. Key takeaways regarding their valuation, when viewed within their industry context, are presented in the commentary that follows.
- INTU’s Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 61.86 is very high. This signifies that its stock is trading at a premium, likely reflecting market optimism about its future growth, though it also implies a higher risk if these growth expectations are not met.
- INTU’s Forward PEG ratio of 4.54 is very high. This signifies that its current stock price is notably elevated compared to its anticipated earnings growth rate, possibly indicating that the market has already factored in, or even exceeded, realistic future performance expectations.
| Symbol | ASML | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 30.50 | 61.86 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.73 | 4.54 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.66 | 11.75 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 15.17 | 10.66 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 22.67 | 41.85 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.49 | 11.86 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML’s dividend yield of 0.95% is notably higher than INTU’s 0.52%, suggesting a stronger emphasis on returning cash to shareholders.
| Symbol | ASML | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.95% | 0.52% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
Explore the financial strength details for ASML and INTU in the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | INTU |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.45 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.45 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.20 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | -0.47 | 0.36 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 39.23 |