Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. HPQ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and HPQ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than HPQ’s 24.42 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.31 for HPQ, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, HPQ is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLHPQ
Company NameASML Holding N.V.HP Inc.
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsComputer Hardware
CEOChristophe D. FouquetEnrique J. Lores
Price794.5 USD26 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD24.42 billion USD
Beta1.221.31
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995November 6, 1957
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and HPQ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. HPQ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HPQ

-1,205.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
123.03%
Q3
15.78%
Median
-13.44%
Q1
-119.16%
Min
-227.95%

HPQ has a negative Return on Equity of -1,205.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

HPQ

21.75%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
30.37%
Q3
20.44%
Median
7.03%
Q1
-12.47%
Min
-31.70%

In the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s Return on Invested Capital of 21.75% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

HPQ

4.64%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
40.72%
Q3
10.87%
Median
4.33%
Q1
-378.64%
Min
-753.20%

HPQ’s Net Profit Margin of 4.64% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

HPQ

6.32%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
13.53%
Median
4.56%
Q1
-295.01%
Min
-592.84%

HPQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.32% is around the midpoint for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLHPQ
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%-1205.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%6.49%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%21.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%4.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%6.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%21.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HPQ

0.73

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
20.73
Q3
11.54
Median
2.69
Q1
1.40
Min
0.73

HPQ’s Current Ratio of 0.73 falls into the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HPQ

3.64

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
1.36
Q3
0.67
Median
0.04
Q1
0.03
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.64, HPQ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Computer Hardware industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

HPQ

8.60

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
32.50
Q3
21.85
Median
4.98
Q1
-7.71
Min
-34.24

HPQ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Computer Hardware industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLHPQ
Current Ratio (TTM)1.520.73
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.910.42
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.213.64
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.28
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.471.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--8.60

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and HPQ. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

HPQ

4.40%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.24%
Q3
1.58%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.40%, HPQ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Computer Hardware industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

HPQ

42.79%

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
193.79%
Q3
30.72%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.79% is in the upper quartile for the Computer Hardware industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLHPQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%4.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%42.79%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HPQ

9.81

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
24.60
Q3
24.01
Median
20.31
Q1
18.24
Min
13.38

HPQ’s P/E Ratio of 9.81 is below the typical range for the Computer Hardware industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

HPQ

1.32

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
9.77
Q3
5.18
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.02

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Computer Hardware industry.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HPQ

0.45

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
57.61
Q3
47.40
Median
3.37
Q1
1.56
Min
0.43

In the lower quartile for the Computer Hardware industry, HPQ’s P/S Ratio of 0.45 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HPQ

8.37

Computer Hardware Industry

Max
21.21
Q3
14.71
Median
9.28
Q1
3.74
Min
0.43

HPQ’s P/B Ratio of 8.37 is within the conventional range for the Computer Hardware industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. HPQ: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Computer Hardware industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLHPQ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.729.81
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.901.32
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.440.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.788.37
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.939.18
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.097.92
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.270.60