Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. GFS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and GFS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than GFS’s 22.01 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.50 for GFS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, GFS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLGFS
Company NameASML Holding N.V.GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductors
CEOChristophe D. FouquetTimothy Graham Breen
Price794.5 USD39.8 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD22.01 billion USD
Beta1.221.50
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995October 28, 2021
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and GFS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. GFS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFS

-1.69%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

GFS has a negative Return on Equity of -1.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their ROE against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

GFS

-2.06%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

GFS has a negative Return on Invested Capital of -2.06%. This indicates that its operations are failing to generate a profit on the total capital invested, signaling significant inefficiency or value destruction.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their ROIC against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFS

-2.77%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

GFS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -2.77%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFS

-3.02%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

GFS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.02%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLGFS
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%-1.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%-1.14%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%-2.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%-2.77%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%-3.02%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%23.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GFS

2.51

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

GFS’s Current Ratio of 2.51 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GFS

0.15

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

GFS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

GFS

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for GFS is currently unavailable.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLGFS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.522.51
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.911.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.15
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.10
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.470.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)----

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and GFS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GFS

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLGFS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFS

-117.28

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

GFS has a negative P/E Ratio of -117.28. This occurs when a company has negative earnings (a net loss), making the ratio unsuitable for valuation analysis.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

GFS

-4.79

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GFS

3.24

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

GFS’s P/S Ratio of 3.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFS

1.99

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

GFS’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. GFS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against the Semiconductors industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLGFS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.72-117.28
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.90-4.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.443.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.781.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9320.88
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0916.39
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.273.25