Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ASML trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with access to a foreign company, while FTV is a standard domestic stock.

SymbolASMLFTV
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Fortive Corporation
CountryNetherlandsUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentMachinery
Market Capitalization296.29 billion USD16.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 15, 1995July 5, 2016
Security TypeNY Reg ShrsCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolASMLFTV
5-Day Price Return0.27%0.50%
13-Week Price Return-3.37%-33.85%
26-Week Price Return-12.28%-41.18%
52-Week Price Return-21.56%-31.92%
Month-to-Date Return4.76%0.23%
Year-to-Date Return-5.36%-35.95%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.45M4.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.68M3.81M
3-Month Volatility35.08%54.38%
Beta1.701.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ASML

47.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ASML’s Return on Equity of 47.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

29.31%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 29.31% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ASML

34.90%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

An Operating Profit Margin of 34.90% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)47.13%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.27%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)29.31%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.90%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.58%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

1.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.41 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

0.22

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.22 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ASML

164.15

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

ASML’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 164.15 is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.410.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.790.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.220.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)164.156.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ASML vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ASML

1.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 1.01% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.57% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.01%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.57%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ASML

26.41

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 26.41 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV

21.25

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.25 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ASML

7.74

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 7.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FTV

2.66

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ASML

12.39

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

ASML’s P/B Ratio of 12.39 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.4121.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.742.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.392.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6711.79