ASML vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and FTV, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs FTV in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 12.17 times the 23.83 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and FTV at 1.16 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while FTV sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Fortive Corporation |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. James A. Lico |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 70.1 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 23.83 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.158 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | July 5, 2016 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and FTV over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and FTV, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 29.99 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 2.51 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 3.85 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 2.34 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 17.13 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 17.63 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 4.33 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 19.26 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and FTV at 0.46% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet ASML’s 0.98% yield, 115% above FTV’s 0.46%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while FTV leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.46% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and FTV, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FTV’s current ratio of 0.99 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ASML at 1.52 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- At 0.78, FTV’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, ASML hits 0.91, covering its bases comfortably.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while FTV at 10.46 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.78 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.38 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.23 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 10.46 |