ASML vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and FIS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dwarfs FIS in market cap, clocking in at 289.86 billion USD—about 6.97 times the 41.60 billion USD of its counterpart.
ASML at 1.22 and FIS at 1.10 move in sync when it comes to market volatility.
Worth noting: ASML flies the ADR flag, tying it to a foreign outfit on U.S. soil, while FIS sticks to plain-vanilla U.S. listing.
| Symbol | ASML | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Ms. Stephanie L. Ferris |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 79.17 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 41.60 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.221 | 1.096 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 20, 2001 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and FIS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
For a detailed comparison of valuation metrics between ASML and FIS, please refer to the table below.
| Symbol | ASML | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.33 | 50.67 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 7.02 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.33 | 4.08 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.58 | 2.77 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.56 | 26.36 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.78 | 15.35 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.15 | 5.19 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 26.97 | 33.51 |
Dividend Comparison
Both ASML at 0.98% and FIS at 1.87% pay dividends, blending income with growth in their strategies. Yet FIS’s 1.87% yield, 90% above ASML’s 0.98%, suggests a focus on generous payouts—possibly from stronger profits—while ASML leans toward reinvestment, perhaps due to tighter margins.
| Symbol | ASML | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 1.87% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and FIS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FIS’s current ratio of 0.63 dips below 1, leaving short-term liabilities larger than current assets—a scenario that could hinge on cash flow support. On the other hand, ASML at 1.52 has enough assets to handle its obligations.
- At 0.63, FIS’s quick ratio falls below 0.8, where liquid assets, minus inventory, can’t keep up with short-term bills—possibly riding on cash flow. By contrast, ASML hits 0.91, covering its bases comfortably.
- ASML posts an interest coverage of “--”, hinting at interest costs so low they’re negligible—often from scant debt or dirt-cheap rates—while FIS at 6.73 handles interest with solid earnings.
| Symbol | ASML | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 0.63 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.80 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.37 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 6.73 |