Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization of 312.40 billion USD is substantially larger than FIS’s 42.96 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.08 for FIS, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, FIS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLFIS
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsConsumer Electronics
CEOChristophe D. FouquetStephanie L. Ferris
Price794.5 USD81.77 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD42.96 billion USD
Beta1.221.08
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995June 20, 2001
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

FIS

5.13%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.30%
Q3
14.30%
Median
5.13%
Q1
-15.88%
Min
-27.23%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 5.13% is on par with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

FIS

4.09%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
4.18%
Q3
4.18%
Median
4.09%
Q1
-0.34%
Min
-0.34%

FIS’s Return on Invested Capital of 4.09% is in line with the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FIS

8.10%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
8.81%
Median
8.10%
Q1
-4.74%
Min
-7.22%

FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FIS

16.77%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
31.81%
Q3
16.77%
Median
10.95%
Q1
-0.21%
Min
-4.78%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.77% is around the midpoint for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%5.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%2.51%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%4.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%8.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%16.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%37.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

FIS

0.63

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
0.82
Q3
0.82
Median
0.70
Q1
0.64
Min
0.63

FIS’s Current Ratio of 0.63 falls into the lower quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.80

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
2.23
Q3
1.47
Median
0.80
Q1
0.51
Min
0.16

FIS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

FIS

6.73

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
14.74
Q3
8.73
Median
3.32
Q1
-40.43
Min
-114.16

FIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.73 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Consumer Electronics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLFIS
Current Ratio (TTM)1.520.63
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.910.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.80
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.37
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.473.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--6.73

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and FIS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FIS

1.86%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
1.88%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.50%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.86%, FIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Electronics industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FIS

98.30%

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
98.30%
Q3
15.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.30% is in the upper quartile for the Consumer Electronics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%1.86%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%98.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS

52.33

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
51.71
Q3
41.35
Median
30.99
Q1
25.46
Min
19.94

At 52.33, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Consumer Electronics industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

FIS

7.25

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.16
Q3
5.62
Median
3.99
Q1
2.77
Min
2.43

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Consumer Electronics industry.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

4.22

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
7.50
Q3
4.17
Median
1.76
Q1
0.88
Min
0.16

FIS’s P/S Ratio of 4.22 is in the upper echelon for the Consumer Electronics industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FIS

2.87

Consumer Electronics Industry

Max
3.36
Q3
3.36
Median
2.83
Q1
2.78
Min
2.78

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Consumer Electronics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ASML vs. FIS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Consumer Electronics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7252.33
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.907.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.444.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.782.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9327.23
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0915.75
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.275.32