ASML vs. FICO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and FICO, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing FICO’s 41.57 billion USD by roughly 6.97×.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.40 for FICO, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while FICO remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | Fair Isaac Corporation |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. William J. Lansing |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 1,707.94 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 41.57 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.40 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | July 22, 1987 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and FICO over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and FICO based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- FICO carries a sub-zero price-to-book ratio of -37.06, indicating negative equity. In contrast, ASML (P/B 14.61) has positive book value.
| Symbol | ASML | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | 72.18 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | 3.42 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.35 | 22.59 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | -37.06 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.61 | 60.17 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.83 | 53.04 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 23.90 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 63.64 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas FICO appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and FICO, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- FICO has negative equity (debt-to-equity ratio -2.27), suggesting asset shortfalls, whereas ASML at 0.21 preserves healthier equity coverage.
- FICO carries a debt-to-assets ratio of 1.39, suggesting substantial asset funding via debt, while ASML at 0.08 opts for a more conservative financing structure.
- ASML shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas FICO (at 9.57) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ASML | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 2.11 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 2.11 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | -2.27 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 1.39 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 9.57 |