ASML vs. CRWD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ASML and CRWD, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ASML dominates in value with a market cap of 289.86 billion USD, eclipsing CRWD’s 108.28 billion USD by roughly 2.68×.
With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 1.22 for CRWD, both show similar volatility profiles relative to the overall market.
ASML trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while CRWD remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ASML | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | ASML Holding N.V. | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. |
| Country | NL | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Infrastructure |
| CEO | Mr. Christophe D. Fouquet | Mr. George R. Kurtz |
| Price | 737.17 USD | 434.74 USD |
| Market Cap | 289.86 billion USD | 108.28 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.22 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| IPO Date | March 15, 1995 | June 12, 2019 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ASML and CRWD over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ASML and CRWD based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- CRWD shows a negative P/E of -5570.63, highlighting a year of losses, whereas ASML at 29.38 trades on solid profitability.
- CRWD shows a negative forward PEG of -213.97, signaling expected earnings contraction, while ASML at 1.80 maintains analysts’ projections for stable or improved profits.
| Symbol | ASML | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 29.38 | -5570.63 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 1.80 | -213.97 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 8.34 | 27.39 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 14.61 | 32.73 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 27.60 | 98.27 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 21.82 | 434.11 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 8.17 | 26.49 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 27.02 | 95.06 |
Dividend Comparison
ASML delivers a 0.98% dividend yield, blending income with growth, whereas CRWD appears to retain its profits, possibly to fund operations, R&D, or other growth initiatives.
| Symbol | ASML | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ASML and CRWD, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ASML shows “--” (minimal interest expense), but CRWD is in the red with interest coverage -4.58, signaling a net operating loss.
| Symbol | ASML | CRWD |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 1.52 | 1.77 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 0.91 | 1.77 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | -4.58 |