Seek Returns logo

ASML vs. COST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ASML and COST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ASML’s market capitalization stands at 312.40 billion USD, while COST’s is 437.72 billion USD, indicating their market valuations are broadly comparable.

With betas of 1.22 for ASML and 0.99 for COST, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.

ASML trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, COST is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolASMLCOST
Company NameASML Holding N.V.Costco Wholesale Corporation
CountryNLUS
SectorTechnologyConsumer Defensive
IndustrySemiconductorsDiscount Stores
CEOChristophe D. FouquetRon M. Vachris
Price794.5 USD987.02 USD
Market Cap312.40 billion USD437.72 billion USD
Beta1.220.99
ExchangeNASDAQNASDAQ
IPO DateMarch 15, 1995July 9, 1986
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ASML and COST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ASML vs. COST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ASML

52.08%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ASML’s Return on Equity of 52.08% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Semiconductors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

COST

31.13%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
31.68%
Q3
28.60%
Median
15.53%
Q1
12.21%
Min
12.12%

In the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Return on Equity of 31.13% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ASML

30.91%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ASML’s Return on Invested Capital of 30.91% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

COST

20.02%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
20.02%
Q3
12.27%
Median
11.13%
Q1
6.51%
Min
5.03%

In the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Return on Invested Capital of 20.02% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ASML

28.33%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.33% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

COST

2.92%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.92%
Q3
2.92%
Median
2.81%
Q1
2.75%
Min
2.75%

COST’s Net Profit Margin of 2.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Discount Stores industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ASML

33.76%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

An Operating Profit Margin of 33.76% places ASML in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

COST

3.75%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
5.42%
Q3
5.42%
Median
4.33%
Q1
3.93%
Min
2.10%

COST’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.75% is in the lower quartile for the Discount Stores industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolASMLCOST
Return on Equity (TTM)52.08%31.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.14%10.39%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)30.91%20.02%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)28.33%2.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)33.76%3.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.01%13.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ASML

1.52

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ASML’s Current Ratio of 1.52 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

COST

1.02

Discount Stores Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
1.23
Median
1.02
Q1
0.78
Min
0.74

COST’s Current Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the median group of the Discount Stores industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ASML

0.21

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ASML’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

COST

0.30

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.40
Median
0.80
Q1
0.31
Min
0.20

Falling into the lower quartile for the Discount Stores industry, COST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.30 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ASML

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ASML is currently unavailable.

COST

916.73

Discount Stores Industry

Max
18.46
Q3
17.45
Median
13.09
Q1
10.49
Min
1.08

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 916.73, COST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Discount Stores industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolASMLCOST
Current Ratio (TTM)1.521.02
Quick Ratio (TTM)0.910.52
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.210.30
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.080.11
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-0.47-0.49
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--916.73

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ASML and COST. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ASML

0.85%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Yield of 0.85% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

COST

0.48%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
4.51%
Q3
0.91%
Median
0.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COST’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is consistent with its peers in the Discount Stores industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ASML

28.49%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ASML’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.49% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

COST

19.69%

Discount Stores Industry

Max
44.99%
Q3
36.65%
Median
19.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

COST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 19.69% is within the typical range for the Discount Stores industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolASMLCOST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.85%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.49%19.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ASML

29.72

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

ASML’s P/E Ratio of 29.72 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

COST

55.87

Discount Stores Industry

Max
55.76
Q3
45.00
Median
33.38
Q1
22.25
Min
10.79

At 55.87, COST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Discount Stores industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ASML

1.90

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

COST

5.06

Discount Stores Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
3.70
Median
2.97
Q1
2.24
Min
1.25

A Forward PEG Ratio of 5.06 places COST in the upper quartile for the Discount Stores industry. This suggests the stock is potentially expensive compared to its peers relative to its growth forecast, which may warrant caution.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ASML

8.44

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

ASML’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

COST

1.63

Discount Stores Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.63
Median
0.96
Q1
0.64
Min
0.43

COST’s P/S Ratio of 1.63 is in the upper echelon for the Discount Stores industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ASML

14.78

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 14.78, ASML’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

COST

16.15

Discount Stores Industry

Max
16.12
Q3
9.30
Median
5.40
Q1
3.27
Min
2.73

At 16.15, COST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Discount Stores industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ASML vs. COST: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Discount Stores industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolASMLCOST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)29.7255.87
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)1.905.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)8.441.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)14.7816.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)27.9359.82
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)22.0937.31
EV-to-Sales (TTM)8.271.61