ARMK vs. IHG: Aramark vs. InterContinental Hotels Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) both belong to the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, though ARMK is classified under Restaurants while IHG falls under Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines.

Aramark (ARMK) trades as ordinary local shares, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Profile Item	ARMK	IHG
Name	Aramark	InterContinental Hotels Group PLC ADR
Country/Region	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry Group	Consumer Services	Consumer Services
GICS Industry	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
GICS Sub-Industry	Restaurants	Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines
Market Capitalization	13.85 billion USD	26.05 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 12, 2013	April 10, 2003
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ARMK

IHG

GSPC

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Total Return (1Y)	45.95%	39.88%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	26.55%	37.41%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	15.73%	22.58%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ARMK

IHG

GSPC

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	27.91%	25.00%
Beta (5Y)	1.08	1.09
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-27.63%	-32.78%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.66M	213.26K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

ARMK and IHG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.49	1.42
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	2.44	2.31

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Aramark (ARMK) earns 11.69% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no ROE this period.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

11.69%

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
ARMK: 11.69%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 76.75%
Q3: 34.07%
Median: 15.90%
Q1: 3.23%
Min: -40.61%
IHG: --

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): IHG does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; ARMK is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 13.40% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Aramark (ARMK) at 1.93%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.93%

Max: 25.52%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
ARMK: 1.93%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

13.40%

Max: 25.52%
IHG: 13.40%
Q3: 12.95%
Median: 6.63%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -14.36%

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their net margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 25.12% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Aramark (ARMK) at 4.42% operates in the bottom quartile.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

4.42%

Max: 49.05%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
ARMK: 4.42%
Min: -16.47%

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

25.12%

Max: 49.05%
IHG: 25.12%
Q3: 24.35%
Median: 14.23%
Q1: 5.67%
Min: -16.47%

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
ROE (TTM)	11.69%	--
ROA (TTM)	4.24%	15.51%
Net Margin (TTM)	1.93%	13.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)	4.42%	25.12%
Gross Margin (TTM)	15.29%	60.97%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 6.35% and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 5.40% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Aramark (ARMK) reports EPS growth of 23.23%, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Revenue Growth (YoY)	6.35%	5.40%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	10.58%	10.06%
EPS Growth (YoY)	23.23%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	17.09%	33.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Aramark (ARMK) at 1.29 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 0.66 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for IHG.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.29

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
ARMK: 1.29
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.22

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

0.66

Max: 3.41
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.72
IHG: 0.66
Min: 0.22

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Aramark (ARMK) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87 against its industry range, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports no figure this period.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

1.87

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
ARMK: 1.87
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

Max: 6.12
Q3: 2.93
Median: 1.29
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.01
IHG: --

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): IHG does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; ARMK is benchmarked against the Consumer Services industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	0.66
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.87	--
Net Debt / EBITDA	4.12	2.89

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Aramark (ARMK) at 0.95% and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 1.08% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

0.95%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
ARMK: 0.95%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

1.08%

Max: 4.10%
Q3: 1.82%
IHG: 1.08%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Aramark (ARMK) at 32.52% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 39.21% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

32.52%

Max: 89.80%
Q3: 36.83%
ARMK: 32.52%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

39.21%

Max: 89.80%
IHG: 39.21%
Q3: 36.83%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.95%	1.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	32.52%	39.21%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Aramark (ARMK) at 36.74 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 37.95 sits in the richer quartile — IHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

36.74

Max: 71.70
Q3: 37.12
ARMK: 36.74
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

37.95

Max: 71.70
IHG: 37.95
Q3: 37.12
Median: 21.88
Q1: 13.00
Min: 5.72

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Aramark (ARMK) at 0.70 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 4.89 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

0.70

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
ARMK: 0.70
Min: 0.08

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

4.89

Max: 6.40
IHG: 4.89
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.54
Q1: 0.74
Min: 0.08

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -53.91, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Aramark (ARMK) reports 4.08, ranking against industry peers normally.

ARMK

Consumer Services industry group

4.08

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
ARMK: 4.08
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51

IHG

Consumer Services industry group

-53.91

Max: 12.02
Q3: 5.58
Median: 2.37
Q1: 1.09
Min: -4.51
IHG: -53.91

Aramark (ARMK) vs. InterContinental Hotels (IHG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Consumer Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Aramark (ARMK) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG)
Metric	ARMK	IHG
P/E Ratio (TTM)	36.74	37.95
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.70	4.89
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.08	-53.91
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	2.70%	3.51%