Seek Returns logo

ARM vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARM and CLS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Overview

ARM’s market capitalization of 163.93 billion USD is substantially larger than CLS’s 18.31 billion USD, indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

ARM’s beta of 4.10 points to significantly higher volatility compared to CLS (beta: 1.64), suggesting ARM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

ARM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, CLS is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolARMCLS
Company NameArm Holdings plc American Depositary SharesCelestica Inc.
CountryGBCA
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustrySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
CEORene Anthony Andrada HaasRobert Andrew Mionis
Price155.09 USD159.26 USD
Market Cap163.93 billion USD18.31 billion USD
Beta4.101.64
ExchangeNASDAQNYSE
IPO DateSeptember 14, 2023June 30, 1998
ADRYesNo

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARM and CLS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.

Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARM vs. CLS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Profitability

Return on Equity

ARM

12.71%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
41.84%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.31%
Q1
-5.54%
Min
-30.12%

ARM’s Return on Equity of 12.71% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLS

23.32%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
38.64%
Q3
17.03%
Median
8.95%
Q1
1.23%
Min
-14.34%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, CLS’s Return on Equity of 23.32% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their ROE against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Return on Invested Capital

ARM

11.37%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
30.91%
Q3
11.34%
Median
4.08%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-19.59%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, ARM’s Return on Invested Capital of 11.37% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

CLS

16.79%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
17.24%
Q3
9.87%
Median
6.54%
Q1
1.56%
Min
-7.50%

In the upper quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, CLS’s Return on Invested Capital of 16.79% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their ROIC against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin

ARM

19.77%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
51.69%
Q3
19.67%
Median
8.56%
Q1
-5.44%
Min
-38.60%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.77% places ARM in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS

4.09%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
22.76%
Q3
11.04%
Median
3.80%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-8.57%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 4.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin

ARM

20.74%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
22.12%
Median
8.40%
Q1
-3.73%
Min
-36.14%

ARM’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.74% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLS

6.01%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
13.73%
Median
8.22%
Q1
4.35%
Min
-0.79%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.01% is around the midpoint for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Operating Margin against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARMCLS
Return on Equity (TTM)12.71%23.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.87%7.07%
Return on Invested Capital (TTM)11.37%16.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.77%4.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.74%6.01%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)95.83%10.59%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio

ARM

5.20

Semiconductors Industry

Max
9.10
Q3
5.23
Median
3.09
Q1
2.49
Min
1.02

ARM’s Current Ratio of 5.20 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLS

1.43

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
3.23
Median
2.37
Q1
1.81
Min
0.58

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.43 falls into the lower quartile for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Current Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio

ARM

0.05

Semiconductors Industry

Max
0.97
Q3
0.46
Median
0.21
Q1
0.05
Min
0.00

ARM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.05 is typical for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS

0.60

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
1.19
Q3
0.56
Median
0.33
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their D/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio

ARM

--

Semiconductors Industry

Max
36.25
Q3
29.12
Median
7.01
Q1
-1.22
Min
-18.18

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ARM is currently unavailable.

CLS

12.39

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
28.37
Q3
14.25
Median
9.35
Q1
2.86
Min
-13.16

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.39 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARMCLS
Current Ratio (TTM)5.201.43
Quick Ratio (TTM)5.200.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM)0.050.60
Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM)0.040.16
Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM)-2.310.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--12.39

Growth

The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for ARM and CLS. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.

Revenue Growth

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Revenue Growth.

Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth.

Free Cash Flow Growth

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their annual year-over-year Free Cash Flow Growth.

Dividend

Dividend Yield

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
0.93%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
2.16%
Q3
0.66%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio

ARM

0.00%

Semiconductors Industry

Max
204.29%
Q3
31.85%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ARM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLS

0.00%

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
71.55%
Q3
25.37%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Payout Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARMCLS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

ARM

206.59

Semiconductors Industry

Max
86.15
Q3
47.38
Median
27.87
Q1
18.89
Min
4.73

At 206.59, ARM’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CLS

44.75

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
86.58
Q3
53.54
Median
36.07
Q1
25.99
Min
12.16

CLS’s P/E Ratio of 44.75 is within the middle range for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/E Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Forward P/E to Growth Ratio

ARM

7.75

Semiconductors Industry

Max
4.73
Q3
2.80
Median
1.11
Q1
0.68
Min
0.01

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.

CLS

2.18

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
5.22
Q3
3.27
Median
2.16
Q1
1.77
Min
0.00

The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their Forward PEG Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio

ARM

40.91

Semiconductors Industry

Max
21.96
Q3
10.21
Median
4.45
Q1
2.32
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 40.91, ARM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Semiconductors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLS

1.82

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.95
Median
2.45
Q1
1.17
Min
0.32

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 1.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/S Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio

ARM

23.92

Semiconductors Industry

Max
13.12
Q3
6.49
Median
3.31
Q1
1.74
Min
0.23

At 23.92, ARM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Semiconductors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLS

11.86

Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry

Max
7.53
Q3
4.63
Median
3.34
Q1
2.35
Min
0.48

At 11.86, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ARM vs. CLS: A comparison of their P/B Ratio against their respective Semiconductors and Hardware, Equipment & Parts industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARMCLS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM)206.5944.75
Forward PEG Ratio (TTM)7.752.18
Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM)40.911.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM)23.9211.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM)1011.9151.94
EV-to-EBITDA (TTM)216.8526.15
EV-to-Sales (TTM)40.481.88