ARM vs. CLS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
UpdatedHere’s a clear look at ARM and CLS, comparing key factors like performance, valuation metrics, dividends, and financial strength. It’s built for investors or anyone curious to see how these two stocks match up.
Company Overview
ARM dominates in value with a market cap of 137.89 billion USD, eclipsing CLS’s 13.11 billion USD by roughly 10.52×.
ARM’s beta of 4.41 points to much larger expected swings compared to CLS’s calmer 1.50, suggesting both higher upside and downside potential.
ARM trades as an ADR, giving U.S. investors a simple on-ramp to its foreign shares, while CLS remains a standard domestic listing.
| Symbol | ARM | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares | Celestica Inc. |
| Country | GB | CA |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| CEO | Mr. Rene Anthony Andrada Haas | Mr. Robert Andrew Mionis |
| Price | 130.45 USD | 114.03 USD |
| Market Cap | 137.89 billion USD | 13.11 billion USD |
| Beta | 4.41 | 1.50 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | September 14, 2023 | June 30, 1998 |
| ADR | Yes | No |
Performance Comparison
This chart compares the performance of ARM and CLS over the past year by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each (starting one year ago).
Hover over the lines to see the investment’s value and total return (%) at specific dates.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Valuation Metrics Comparison
The section examines key financial ratios to assess the valuation of ARM and CLS based on earnings, cash flow, sales, and book value. Pay attention to the following notable points where extreme values stand out.
- ARM stands out with a premium P/E of 170.26, while CLS at 32.04 remains within a more conventional earnings multiple.
| Symbol | ARM | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 170.26 | 32.04 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 6.09 | 1.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 37.33 | 1.30 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 21.38 | 8.49 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 220.26 | 37.19 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 221.33 | 18.97 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 36.85 | 1.36 |
| EV-to-Free Cash Flow (TTM) | 217.45 | 39.00 |
Dividend Comparison
Neither ARM nor CLS currently pays a dividend yield; this often indicates they are reinvesting earnings for growth, prioritizing long-term expansion over immediate cash returns to shareholders.
| Symbol | ARM | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financial Strength Metrics Comparison
This section dives into the financial resilience of ARM and CLS, spotlighting key metrics like liquidity, leverage, and debt coverage. Check out the standout observations below where notable differences or extremes pop up.
- ARM shows “--” for interest coverage, hinting at negligible interest costs, whereas CLS (at 12.39) covers its interest obligations.
| Symbol | ARM | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 4.96 | 0.85 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.04 | 0.60 |
| Debt-to-Assets Ratio (TTM) | 0.03 | 0.16 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | -- | 12.39 |