ARES vs. PAYP: Ares Management vs. PayPay Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ares Management (ARES) and PayPay (PAYP) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but ARES is classified in Capital Markets while PAYP is classified in Financial Services.

Ares Management (ARES) has been public since May 2, 2014 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while PayPay (PAYP) only listed on March 12, 2026 — long-window metrics on the PAYP side should be interpreted with caution.

Ares Management (ARES) trades as ordinary local shares, while PayPay (PAYP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Ares Management (ARES) has an aggressive beta of 1.45, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while PayPay (PAYP) is defensive at 0.24 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both ARES and PAYP need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: PayPay (PAYP) earns 18.80% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Ares Management (ARES) has no ROE this period.

Both Ares Management (ARES) at 8.69% and PayPay (PAYP) at 15.85% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

PayPay (PAYP) at 32.79% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Ares Management (ARES) at 2.89% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Ares Management (ARES) at 44.19% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while PayPay (PAYP) at 25.85% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for ARES.

PayPay (PAYP) at 230.06% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Ares Management (ARES) at -16.67%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Ares Management (ARES) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Ares Management (ARES) in Financial Services and PayPay (PAYP) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ares Management (ARES) reports a yield of 3.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Ares Management (ARES) reports payout ratio above 100% at 423.77%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; PayPay (PAYP) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

PayPay (PAYP) at 23.30 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Ares Management (ARES) at 109.82 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for ARES’s trailing earnings.

PayPay (PAYP) at 0.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ares Management (ARES) at 8.92 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Both look rich against book: PayPay (PAYP) at 3.75 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Ares Management (ARES) at 12.15 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics