ARES vs. FUTU: Ares Management vs. Futu Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Ares Management (ARES) and Futu (FUTU) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though ARES is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while FUTU falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Ares Management (ARES) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Ares Management (ARES) has an aggressive beta of 1.45, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Futu (FUTU) earns 30.52% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Ares Management (ARES) has no ROE this period.

Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Ares Management (ARES) at 8.69%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Ares Management (ARES) at 2.89% operates in the bottom quartile.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but Futu (FUTU) at 68.11% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Ares Management (ARES) at 44.19% also sits in the top quartile.

Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ares Management (ARES) at -16.67% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for FUTU.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Ares Management (ARES) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Ares Management (ARES) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Ares Management (ARES) reports a yield of 3.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Ares Management (ARES) reports payout ratio above 100% at 423.77%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Futu (FUTU) reports 25.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Ares Management (ARES) at 109.82 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for ARES’s trailing earnings.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ares Management (ARES) at 8.92 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Ares Management (ARES) at 12.15 prices above its benchmark range — ARES looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics