Seek Returns logo

ARES vs. BBUC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ARES and BBUC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolARESBBUC
Company NameAres Management CorporationBrookfield Business Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization48.94 billion USD2.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 2014March 7, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ARES and BBUC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ARES vs. BBUC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolARESBBUC
5-Day Price Return-0.54%1.38%
13-Week Price Return-15.35%11.21%
26-Week Price Return14.71%21.48%
52-Week Price Return-6.70%39.57%
Month-to-Date Return-6.31%1.93%
Year-to-Date Return-15.38%35.63%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.68M0.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.54M0.04M
3-Month Volatility29.81%37.69%
Beta1.592.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ARES

13.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

ARES’s Return on Equity of 13.30% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BBUC

3.82%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

BBUC’s Return on Equity of 3.82% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ARES

9.94%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, ARES’s Net Profit Margin of 9.94% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BBUC

-12.62%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

BBUC has a negative Net Profit Margin of -12.62%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ARES

17.40%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

ARES’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.40% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BBUC

-3.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

BBUC has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.86%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolARESBBUC
Return on Equity (TTM)13.30%3.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.85%-5.52%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.94%-12.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.40%-3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--8.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

0.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BBUC

0.56

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

BBUC’s Current Ratio of 0.56 falls into the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

2.93

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BBUC

22.77

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 22.77, BBUC operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ARES

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BBUC

-1.52

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

BBUC has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.52. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolARESBBUC
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.310.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.310.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.9322.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)---1.52

Growth

Revenue Growth

ARES vs. BBUC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ARES vs. BBUC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ARES

4.83%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.83%, ARES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Capital Markets industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BBUC

0.55%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

BBUC’s Dividend Yield of 0.55% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ARES

323.31%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

At 323.31%, ARES’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BBUC

1.76%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

BBUC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 1.76% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolARESBBUC
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.83%0.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)323.31%1.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ARES

67.01

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

At 67.01, ARES’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BBUC

--

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

P/E Ratio data for BBUC is currently unavailable.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ARES

6.66

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

ARES’s P/S Ratio of 6.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BBUC

0.40

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, BBUC’s P/S Ratio of 0.40 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ARES

12.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

At 12.97, ARES’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BBUC

4.83

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

BBUC’s P/B Ratio of 4.83 is in the upper tier for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ARES vs. BBUC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolARESBBUC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)67.01--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.660.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.974.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.0991.59